Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test(*) change E2E test of jobs #1972

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 10, 2021
Merged

Conversation

jakubdyszkiewicz
Copy link
Contributor

I think due to the slower propagation of policies on CircleCI, sometimes we had a problem with should sync traffic permissions.

The test should sync traffic permissions diverged to not be about syncing traffic permissions, but many different things.
For traffic permissions, we now have a dedicated test suite including hybrid deployment, so I don't think it belongs here.

I changed this and the previous test and this one to be about Jobs, because it's what we testing here.
I noticed that for failing job we are waiting for very long time! I don't think it's ok to slow down tests by a couple of minutes to just to check that CP does not remove job. I did not found a clean way to test it, so in the end I removed this case, it is covered by unit test.

If you think that it is essential to keep this test case of a failing job, I can spend a day figuring this out.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Dyszkiewicz <jakub.dyszkiewicz@gmail.com>
@jakubdyszkiewicz jakubdyszkiewicz requested a review from a team as a code owner May 10, 2021 11:25
@jakubdyszkiewicz jakubdyszkiewicz merged commit fdfbe03 into master May 10, 2021
@jakubdyszkiewicz jakubdyszkiewicz deleted the ci/change-e2e-jobs-test branch May 10, 2021 13:05
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 10, 2021
Signed-off-by: Jakub Dyszkiewicz <jakub.dyszkiewicz@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit fdfbe03)
jakubdyszkiewicz pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 10, 2021
Signed-off-by: Jakub Dyszkiewicz <jakub.dyszkiewicz@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants