Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: use json instead of geopackage format #5

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 8, 2023
Merged

fix: use json instead of geopackage format #5

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 8, 2023

Conversation

12rambau
Copy link
Owner

@12rambau 12rambau commented Jan 8, 2023

Fix #3

distant reading is faster and the downloading of sub region as well. The only moment .gpkg and .json are competing is when requesting the smallest level.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 8, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #5 (19a4fe2) into main (0d8dabd) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main        #5   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            1         1           
  Lines           67        66    -1     
=========================================
- Hits            67        66    -1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pygadm/__init__.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@12rambau 12rambau marked this pull request as ready for review January 8, 2023 15:53
@12rambau 12rambau merged commit 6f18b78 into main Jan 8, 2023
@12rambau 12rambau deleted the json branch January 8, 2023 17:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

use the geojson version of the files to reduce downloading times
1 participant