You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I miss vim-sneak. I know that leap is supposed to be an improvement on it, but I personally find it to be worse. I like the minimal number of keys I need to hit (e.g. sab to jump to the first instance of ab), and using ; to advance to the exact pair I want is often faster than reviewing the set of keys I need to hit when using leap.
I think implementing sneak would be pretty easy (much easier than leap): API wise it would involve allowing seek.seek to accept count number of characters (defaulting to 1).
Implementation wise I think it would involve something along the lines of:
Sounds good to me! Alternatively I wonder if the handling of "accept multiple keypresses" should be moved into keypress (to avoid disabling and re-enabling input mode), but if the direct approach with keypress in a loop has good UX it's good enough.
I miss
vim-sneak
. I know thatleap
is supposed to be an improvement on it, but I personally find it to be worse. I like the minimal number of keys I need to hit (e.g.sab
to jump to the first instance ofab
), and using;
to advance to the exact pair I want is often faster than reviewing the set of keys I need to hit when usingleap
.I think implementing sneak would be pretty easy (much easier than leap): API wise it would involve allowing
seek.seek
to acceptcount
number of characters (defaulting to 1).Implementation wise I think it would involve something along the lines of:
Happy to take a stab at adding this feature.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: