You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the Lean backend, the progress tactic performs a lot of work to automate proofs and handle the Aeneas monadic translation.
However, the current tactic also assumes particular shapes for specifications, which might change as the tactic evolves.
To avoid surprises, it would be useful to detect when applying progress whether function specifications have the expected shape. This could for instance be done either by analyzing goals and hypotheses inside progress, by using a custom linter, or possibly by providing custom syntax for program specification that ensures the correct shape.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the Lean backend, the
progress
tactic performs a lot of work to automate proofs and handle the Aeneas monadic translation.However, the current tactic also assumes particular shapes for specifications, which might change as the tactic evolves.
To avoid surprises, it would be useful to detect when applying
progress
whether function specifications have the expected shape. This could for instance be done either by analyzing goals and hypotheses insideprogress
, by using a custom linter, or possibly by providing custom syntax for program specification that ensures the correct shape.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: