diff --git a/text/3392-leadership-council.md b/text/3392-leadership-council.md
index 8becf2971da..e375d02ea00 100644
--- a/text/3392-leadership-council.md
+++ b/text/3392-leadership-council.md
@@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ If any Council member believes a moderation decision (or series of decisions) ha
 
 One of the mechanisms this RFC provides for checking the moderation team's actions in a privacy-preserving manner is an audit mechanism. In any case where any Council member believes moderation team actions have not followed documented policies or procedures, the Council member may decide to initiate the audit process. (In particular, they might do this in response to a report from a community member involved in a moderation situation.) This happens *in addition* to the above engagement and conversation; it is not a replacement for direct communication between the Council and the moderation team.
 
-In an audit, the contingent moderation team works with the moderation team to establish whether the moderation team followed documented policies and procedures. This mechanism necessarily involves the contingent moderation team using their own judgment to evaluate moderation policy, specific evidence or communications, and corresponding moderation actions or proposed actions. However, this mechanism is not intended to second-guess the actions themselves; the audit mechanism focuses on establishing whether the moderation team is acting according to its established policy and procedures.
+In an audit, the contingent moderation team works with the moderation team to establish whether the moderation team followed documented policies and procedures. This mechanism necessarily involves the contingent moderation team using their own judgment to evaluate moderation policy, specific evidence or communications, and corresponding moderation actions or proposed actions. However, this mechanism is not intended to second-guess the actions themselves; the audit mechanism focuses on establishing whether the moderation team is acting according to its established policy and procedures, as well as highlighting unintended negative consequences of the policies and procedures themselves.
 
 The contingent moderators also reach out to the Council to find out any additional context they might need.