Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DNS] Issues with 'az network dns record-set update' #1133

Closed
4 of 6 tasks
jtuliani opened this issue Oct 24, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed
4 of 6 tasks

[DNS] Issues with 'az network dns record-set update' #1133

jtuliani opened this issue Oct 24, 2016 · 3 comments
Labels
JRS Network az network vnet/lb/nic/dns/etc...

Comments

@jtuliani
Copy link

jtuliani commented Oct 24, 2016

Issues with 'az network dns record-set update':

@JasonRShaver JasonRShaver added Network az network vnet/lb/nic/dns/etc... JRS labels Oct 31, 2016
@JasonRShaver
Copy link
Contributor

  • remove if-none-match
  • add short summary
  • add examples section
  • add -z and -t

Discuss generic update and arugments section
Discuss adding metadata with --add

@jtuliani
Copy link
Author

jtuliani commented Nov 4, 2016

For metadata, we need examples covering:

  • Removing all metadata
  • Adding a new metadata item (suggest using "dept=finance")
  • Removing an existing metadata item, leaving other items in place (again, use "dept=finance")

@tjprescott
Copy link
Member

tjprescott commented Dec 16, 2016

@jtuliani IRT item 1, the DNS SDK is unique in that it actually has a patch operation for a pure update (although we leverage create_or_update for other reasons), but even that exposes if_none_match.

@jtuliani jtuliani changed the title Issues with 'az network dns record-set update' [DNS] Issues with 'az network dns record-set update' Feb 16, 2017
@haroldrandom haroldrandom added JRS Network az network vnet/lb/nic/dns/etc... labels Oct 25, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
JRS Network az network vnet/lb/nic/dns/etc...
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants