SONiC ACL based Metering HLD #1580
Conversation
Signed-off-by: rajkumar38 <rpennadamram@marvell.com>
|
community review recording https://zoom.us/rec/share/eeYyppT83wfFB8AZbUF1qqCeHxnoDfRVtrEeXrsnuX71DjrJAn5QKRaBFB9l2nfR.PDKI31uK3y0qXsUI |
| acl-loader script will be updated to display policer action in show output. | ||
|
|
||
| ```c | ||
| admin@sonic:~$ show acl rule |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
How about policer statistics? Any plan to have CLI for ACL policer statistics? Please update the HLD.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Since policer can be attached to different entities (port, mirror, acl), we will take it up as separate task. We will come up with separate HLD for the same. I will capture in Overview section that "policer statistics is not supported as part of this HLD" .
| Ethernet3 | ||
| Ethernet4 | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could you include CRM for the policer resources.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Based on vendor SAI, policer resources can be per stage. And there is NO existing attribute or API to query the max and current object in SAI per STAGE. Will check with SAI community and update the HLD accordingly.
| - MIRRORV6 | ||
| - MIRRORDSCP | ||
|
|
||
| - Support for stage: INGRESS and EGRESS. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
why STAGE_PRE_INGRESS is not supported?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Support for stage PRE/POST INGRESS is not yet added in SONiC acl. I will explicitly capture the same in HLD.
|
|
||
| In acl-loader script, an optional argument "--policer_name" will be taken as input and all rules configured as part of the json will be enabled with policer action. | ||
| ``` | ||
| acl-loader update full /tmp/test.json --policer_name policer_1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It seems more better to assign policy action per acl rule in json file more than per json.
Is there command config policy mode/cir/cbs?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Note that this is optional argument. Will explore the option of adding the policer action per rule and will update the HLD.
| + leaf-list actions { | ||
| + type enumeration { | ||
| + enum PACKET_ACTION; | ||
| + enum POLICER; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes. Will update.
| Say for flow "x", P1 is applied first, and the remaining traffic is policed by P2. Other traffic flows are applied with policer P1. | ||
| ### Testing Design | ||
|
|
||
| #### VS Test cases |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please plan to have unit tests in swss instead of python VS tests.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sure. Going forward, is python VS test is optional ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not exactly. There would be cases which cannot be covered by unit-test in which case we can use VS test.
Support ACL action Policer for stage ingress/egress