Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
235 lines (139 loc) · 7.51 KB

2.8-Comparisons.md

File metadata and controls

235 lines (139 loc) · 7.51 KB

2.8 Comparisons

Many comparison operators we know from maths:

  • Greater/less than: a > b, a < b.

  • Greater/less than or equals: a >= b, a <= b.

  • Equality check is written as a == b (please note the double equation sign =. A single symbol a = b would mean an assignment).

  • Not equals. In maths the notation is , in JavaScript it’s written as an assignment with an exclamation sign before it: a != b.

Boolean is the result

Just as all other operators, a comparison returns a value. The value is of the boolean type.

  • true – means “yes”, “correct” or “the truth”.

  • false – means “no”, “wrong” or “a lie”.

For example:

alert( 2 > 1 );  // true (correct)
alert( 2 == 1 ); // false (wrong)
alert( 2 != 1 ); // true (correct)

A comparison result can be assigned to a variable, just like any value:

let result = 5 > 4; // assign the result of the comparison
alert( result ); // true

String comparison

To see which string is greater than the other, the so-called “dictionary” or “lexicographical” order is used.

In other words, strings are compared letter-by-letter.

For example:

alert( 'Z' > 'A' ); // true
alert( 'Glow' > 'Glee' ); // true
alert( 'Bee' > 'Be' ); // true

The algorithm to compare two strings is simple:

  1. Compare first characters of both strings.

  2. If the first one is greater(or less), then the first string is greater(or less) than the second. We’re done.

  3. Otherwise if first characters are equal, compare the second characters the same way.

  4. Repeat until the end of any string.

  5. If both strings ended simultaneously, then they are equal. Otherwise the longer string is greater.

In the example above, the comparison 'Z' > 'A' gets the result at the first step.

Strings "Glow" and "Glee" are compared character-by-character:

G is the same as G. l is the same as l. o is greater than e. Stop here. The first string is greater.


Not a real dictionary, but Unicode order

The comparison algorithm given above is roughly equivalent to the one used in book dictionaries or phone books. But it’s not exactly the same.

For instance, case matters. A capital letter "A" is not equal to the lowercase "a". Which one is greater? Actually, the lowercase "a" is. Why? Because the lowercase character has a greater index in the internal encoding table (Unicode). We’ll get back to specific details and consequences in the chapter Strings.


Comparison of different types

When compared values belong to different types, they are converted to numbers.

For example:

alert( '2' > 1 ); // true, string '2' becomes a number 2
alert( '01' == 1 ); // true, string '01' becomes a number 1

For boolean values, true becomes 1 and false becomes 0, that’s why:

alert( true == 1 ); // true
alert( false == 0 ); // true

A funny consequence

It is possible that at the same time:

  • Two values are equal.

  • One of them is true as a boolean and the other one is false as a boolean.

For example:

let a = 0;
alert( Boolean(a) ); // false

let b = "0";
alert( Boolean(b) ); // true

alert(a == b); // true!

From JavaScript’s standpoint that’s quite normal. An equality check converts using the numeric conversion (hence "0" becomes 0), while Boolean conversion uses another set of rules.


Strict equality

A regular equality check == has a problem. It cannot differ 0 from false:

alert( 0 == false ); // true

The same thing with an empty string:

alert( '' == false ); // true

That’s because operands of different types are converted to a number by the equality operator ==. An empty string, just like false, becomes a zero.

What to do if we’d like to differentiate 0 from false?

A strict equality operator === checks the equality without type conversion.

In other words, if a and b are of different types, then a === b immediately returns false without an attempt to convert them.

Let’s try it:

alert( 0 === false ); // false, because the types are different

There also exists a “strict non-equality” operator !==, as an analogy for !=.

The strict equality check operator is a bit longer to write, but makes it obvious what’s going on and leaves less space for errors.

Comparison with null and undefined

Let’s see more edge cases.

There’s a non-intuitive behavior when null or undefined are compared with other values.

For a strict equality check === These values are different, because each of them belongs to a separate type of its own.

alert( null === undefined ); // false

For a non-strict check ==

There’s a special rule. These two are a “sweet couple”: they equal each other (in the sense of ==), but not any other value.

alert( null == undefined ); // true

For maths and other comparisons < > <= >=

Values null/undefined are converted to a number: null becomes 0, while undefined becomes NaN.

Now let’s see funny things that happen when we apply those rules. And, what’s more important, how to not fall into a trap with these features.

Strange result: null vs 0

Let’s compare null with a zero:

alert( null > 0 );  // (1) false
alert( null == 0 ); // (2) false
alert( null >= 0 ); // (3) true

Yeah, mathematically that’s strange. The last result states that "null is greater than or equal to zero". Then one of the comparisons above must be correct, but they are both false.

The reason is that an equality check == and comparisons > < >= <= work differently. Comparisons convert null to a number, hence treat it as 0. That’s why (3) null >= 0 is true and (1) null > 0 is false.

On the other hand, the equality check == for undefined and null works by the rule, without any conversions. They equal each other and don’t equal anything else. That’s why (2) null == 0 is false.

An incomparable undefined

The value undefined shouldn’t participate in comparisons at all:

alert( undefined > 0 ); // false (1)
alert( undefined < 0 ); // false (2)
alert( undefined == 0 ); // false (3)

Why does it dislike a zero so much? Always false!

We’ve got these results because:

Comparisons (1) and (2) return false because undefined gets converted to NaN. And NaN is a special numeric value which returns false for all comparisons.

The equality check (3) returns false, because undefined only equals null and no other value.

Evade problems

Why did we observe these examples? Should we remember these peculiarities all the time? Well, not really. Actually, these tricky things will gradually become familiar over time, but there’s a solid way to evade any problems with them.

Just treat any comparison with undefined/null except the strict equality === with exceptional care.

Don’t use comparisons >= > < <= with a variable which may be null/undefined, unless you are really sure what you’re doing. If a variable can have such values, then check for them separately.

Summary

  • Comparison operators return a logical value.

  • Strings are compared letter-by-letter in the “dictionary” order.

  • When values of different types are compared, they get converted to numbers (with the exclusion of a strict equality check).

  • Values null and undefined equal == each other and do not equal any other value.

  • Be careful when using comparisons like > or < with variables that can occasionally be null/undefined. Making a separate check for null/undefined is a good idea.