You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
At present, wordLang passes establish/preserve a number of syntactic properties across different phases.
These properties have gotten a bit too much to handle for adding new passes (one often needs to prove several syntactic properties completely unrelated to the semantic correctness proof).
This issue is about taking a first step towards fixing this.
I suggest to create two files:
semantics/word_convTheory which will store all the definitions of syntactic conventions that need to be preserved ACROSS passes in wordLang. Most (or all?) of these are currently in semantics/wordPropsTheory so this is a matter of moving them.
proofs/word_convProofTheory which will store the individual proof of the syntax properties for every pass.
The idea is that, for a new compiler pass, it should be hopefully relatively easy to test that we have met all the necessary syntactic conventions by building word_convProofTheory.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
At present, wordLang passes establish/preserve a number of syntactic properties across different phases.
These properties have gotten a bit too much to handle for adding new passes (one often needs to prove several syntactic properties completely unrelated to the semantic correctness proof).
This issue is about taking a first step towards fixing this.
I suggest to create two files:
semantics/word_convTheory
which will store all the definitions of syntactic conventions that need to be preserved ACROSS passes in wordLang. Most (or all?) of these are currently insemantics/wordPropsTheory
so this is a matter of moving them.proofs/word_convProofTheory
which will store the individual proof of the syntax properties for every pass.The idea is that, for a new compiler pass, it should be hopefully relatively easy to test that we have met all the necessary syntactic conventions by building
word_convProofTheory
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: