You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Originally posted by cffls March 9, 2022
Currently, responses returned by matches doesn't not have block hash. Since the response already contains the slot in which the transaction lives, my naive guess is that it wouldn't be much work to add block hash in the response?
The reason that I would want to see block hash in the returned value is that so I can query the entire block using both block hash and slot number in Ogmios (findIntersect API). My main use case is to get the actual datum sitting at a specific address by using only Kupo and Ogmios, without running additional sync service or database, such as cardano-db-sync (I try to avoid adding new services as much as possible). Do you think this usage pattern is reasonable?
An alternative solution to such use case is to add datum directly in the response of matches API if they present in the witness of the transaction, but this might be a bigger change than simply adding the block hash.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Discussed in #5
Originally posted by cffls March 9, 2022
Currently, responses returned by
matches
doesn't not have block hash. Since the response already contains the slot in which the transaction lives, my naive guess is that it wouldn't be much work to add block hash in the response?The reason that I would want to see block hash in the returned value is that so I can query the entire block using both block hash and slot number in Ogmios (findIntersect API). My main use case is to get the actual datum sitting at a specific address by using only Kupo and Ogmios, without running additional sync service or database, such as cardano-db-sync (I try to avoid adding new services as much as possible). Do you think this usage pattern is reasonable?
An alternative solution to such use case is to add datum directly in the response of
matches
API if they present in the witness of the transaction, but this might be a bigger change than simply adding the block hash.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: