Replies: 1 comment
-
I don't think we need a new GitHub project. And I'm not interested in "setting goals" as I'm a single hobbyist just writing this as a hobby. So "code coverage percentages" are not a big concern to me. However, more tests are generally welcome as they tend to simplify testing during development, so feel free to suggest/provide possible test cases. Catima uses Robolectric, so more Robolectric tests are probably easiest. But it may be worth considering if whatever is the current standard for Android tests will work too :) For new automation workflows, #712 is still open, having screenshot generation and/or tests would help too. Given this is not really an issue, I'm converting this to a discussion :) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hello,
As a first-time contributor, I've noticed an opportunity to strengthen the repo's testing framework (which also aligns with one of the goals that is written in the documentation) . I propose we create a dedicated GitHub project to systematically track and improve our testing efforts. This project could include:
I believe these enhancements will not only boost our testing efficiency but also contribute to a more stable and reliable codebase. I'm eager to discuss this further and contribute to its implementation.
Thank you for considering this suggestion.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions