Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MIME types for tile formats #60

Closed
pjcozzi opened this issue Jan 26, 2016 · 6 comments
Closed

MIME types for tile formats #60

pjcozzi opened this issue Jan 26, 2016 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@pjcozzi
Copy link
Contributor

pjcozzi commented Jan 26, 2016

Cesium's Node.js development server is using application/octet-stream for now.

Related glTF discussion: KhronosGroup/glTF#412

@emackey
Copy link

emackey commented Jan 26, 2016

Just a reminder, IIS will not serve any files with unknown file extensions. So if you've defined new file extensions for 3D tiles, but not added them explicitly to web.config, then IIS-based installations won't be able to access those files.

@pjcozzi
Copy link
Contributor Author

pjcozzi commented Jan 26, 2016

Cesium's web.config was updated in #3468.

@pjcozzi
Copy link
Contributor Author

pjcozzi commented Jul 16, 2017

Current tileset.json MIME type: application/json

@ggetz
Copy link
Contributor

ggetz commented May 11, 2018

Resolved in #301

@ggetz ggetz closed this as completed May 11, 2018
@thw0rted
Copy link

thw0rted commented Jul 24, 2018

I don't think #301 resolved all the mime types for the various tile formats -- c.f. point cloud which is still listed as application/octet-stream. The other tile format READMEs include the same TODO item with a reference to this ticket.

@ggetz
Copy link
Contributor

ggetz commented Jul 24, 2018

Changes are in the 1.0 branch - See https://github.com/AnalyticalGraphicsInc/3d-tiles/tree/1.0/specification/TileFormats/PointCloud#file-extension-and-mime-type

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants