Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use mocha instead of jasmine for test runner #779

Closed
joojis opened this issue Oct 2, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Use mocha instead of jasmine for test runner #779

joojis opened this issue Oct 2, 2018 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@joojis
Copy link
Contributor

joojis commented Oct 2, 2018

It seems that mocha is able to know whether the test failed in afterEach().

But I haven't found a spec or documentation for currentTest field. It needs to be confirmed.

@joojis joojis added the test label Oct 2, 2018
@hyunsikjeong hyunsikjeong self-assigned this Nov 26, 2018
@hyunsikjeong
Copy link
Contributor

@joojis It seems it's possible to do so. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22031765/how-might-i-check-if-any-mocha-tests-failed-from-within-an-after-block

@hyunsikjeong
Copy link
Contributor

I've tried to find out the way to detect test failures in afterEach in Jest, but it's still not possible.
There's no way to escape from this issue. I'll try to migrate the integration test.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants