[Closed] Reorganize our repo structure to be more MAUI #208
Replies: 4 comments 3 replies
-
How do we plan to publish them? Will it be multiple packages and users install only what they need (maybe we can add |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Looks like we have a similar discussion #175 and it received 3 dislikes |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Looking at the Comet source code, I'm not sure how much code we would be able to share between For example, Comet doesn't use Converters (that's mostly an MVVM/XAML thing), Comet doesn't have Behaviors, Comet uses its own unique Animation implementation and Comet creates its own Controls (e.g. it provides its own implements of |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Closed as answered. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Since this repo will implement features in the same way that MAUI does, we should follow the .NET MAUI structure. We should split our code into more projects:
This separation will help us to respect the separation concerns and support more MAUI-based frameworks in the future with minimal efforts, like Comet or Fabulous.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions