Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Page for data protection & security #483

Open
pr130 opened this issue Jun 12, 2023 · 10 comments
Open

Page for data protection & security #483

pr130 opened this issue Jun 12, 2023 · 10 comments
Labels

Comments

@pr130
Copy link
Contributor

pr130 commented Jun 12, 2023

Analogous to our values, we should have a page dedicated to data protection & security.

Content (to be provided by data protection team)

  • introduce Data protection & security team
  • summarize best practices & links to relevant pages in the docs
  • Datenschutzerklärung

Location:

  • either in footer or about us menu , footer preferred (i think that's where people look for it)
@pr130
Copy link
Contributor Author

pr130 commented Sep 4, 2023

@mariotruss

@jstet
Copy link
Member

jstet commented Feb 1, 2024

Any updates regarding this @mariotruss ?

@jstet jstet self-assigned this Feb 1, 2024
@jstet jstet removed the backlog label Feb 1, 2024
@jstet jstet removed their assignment Feb 1, 2024
@jstet
Copy link
Member

jstet commented Feb 9, 2024

I discussed with @mariotruss on Slack and we don't need consent or to inform users for using plausible. However we will still draft a data privacy page first

@jstet jstet added Priority and removed Priority labels Feb 19, 2024
@jstet
Copy link
Member

jstet commented Feb 19, 2024

We already have a data privacy statement in the imprint and thats sufficient for plausible.

info about the data privacy team and best practices still needs to be added

@mariotruss
Copy link

@jstet : Okay thanks for the update. I will write a draft until end of next week.

@mariotruss
Copy link

@jstet: I just checked the website (https://www.correlaid.org/en/about/values). If you say that we already have a "data privacy statement in the imprint and thats sufficient for plausible". Though, I was not able to find the bit about plausible in the data privacy statement in the imprint. Maybe it would be an idea to make it its own site to be accessible from here:
image

What I found is the "Our Values" page. It also includes the links to rules of ethics committee in both German and English.
It also includes best practices to get in contact with us. Info about the team is available in the value page as well.

Under this part in the imprint
image
I would as the following:
German: Datenschutz ist in essentieller Bestandteil unserer Arbeit. Die durchführten Maßnahmen wurde mit Zusammenarbeit mit unserer Ethik Kommision entwickelt. Mehr Infos dazu unter https://www.correlaid.org/ueber/werte/.
English: Data Privacy is at the core of our work. All measurements were defined in cooperation with Ethics Commitee. Find more information here: https://www.correlaid.org/en/about/values/

So my question is a bit what do you still need exactly?

@jstet
Copy link
Member

jstet commented Mar 4, 2024

Hey, regarding plausible, I thought your assessment in our slack conversation was that as plausible doesn't process personal info, we don't need any special information/agreement.

Thanks for checking the existing text, I will change it asap.

As Frie created this issue back int the day, maybe he can provide some more details again @friep

@mariotruss
Copy link

Hi @jstet,
What I was trying to say in our chat is that we don't need to ask for consent, as we don't use cookies. But I guess it could still be transparent & fair to say that we use plausible to analyze web usage in an anonymized way.

@mariotruss
Copy link

Thanks for the quick feedback!

@jstet
Copy link
Member

jstet commented Mar 6, 2024

I have added the following to the imprint:

The only tracking code used on this website is Plausible. Although only anonymised aggregated data is collected that cannot be attributed to any individual, we would like to inform you about this for reasons of transparency.

Do you think that's enough?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

When branches are created from issues, their pull requests are automatically linked.

3 participants