You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In #323, we added support for handling SubMsg in multi-test. Namely, execution was only committed to state on success (multi-level caches) and if reply_on matched, they reply was called from the contract that sent the SubMsg.
All state is properly updated. However, I think we don't properly handle events or data when reply is called (combining them with the actual execution).
In fact, with some reflection, I think we may be doing the wrapping in the wrong place.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In #323, we added support for handling SubMsg in multi-test. Namely, execution was only committed to state on success (multi-level caches) and if reply_on matched, they reply was called from the contract that sent the SubMsg.
All state is properly updated. However, I think we don't properly handle
events
ordata
when reply is called (combining them with the actual execution).In fact, with some reflection, I think we may be doing the wrapping in the wrong place.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: