We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Inspired by https://github.com/terra-money/core/pull/584
We want to prevent from recursive smart queries that consume a lot of resources but may not cost much fees. Options we have:
a) allow level n depth of queries where each contract that runs a smart query increases the depth by 1.
example: A(0) -calls-> B, B(1) -calls -> C(2) -calls->D A(0) -calls-> B, A(0) -calls -> C(1) -calls->D
b) allow n number of total smart queries in total
example: A(0) -calls-> B, B(1) -calls -> C(2) -calls->D A(0) -calls-> B, A(1) -calls -> C(2) -calls->D
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This would be breaking. Best to do by 1.0 if you don't want to wait til 2.0, right?
Seems fine with me
Sorry, something went wrong.
Replaced by #670
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Inspired by https://github.com/terra-money/core/pull/584
We want to prevent from recursive smart queries that consume a lot of resources but may not cost much fees.
Options we have:
a) allow level n depth of queries where each contract that runs a smart query increases the depth by 1.
b) allow n number of total smart queries in total
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: