Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Proposal of adding Retention/Disposal element nr3 #363

Closed
karinbredenberg opened this issue Mar 11, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

Proposal of adding Retention/Disposal element nr3 #363

karinbredenberg opened this issue Mar 11, 2019 · 3 comments
Labels
DILCIS review Issues that need to go for discussion within the DILCIS Board meetings enhancement Issues that are an enhancement needed to be evaluated and action decided Review comment This issue originates from the review process
Milestone
CSIP Version 2.1

Comments

@karinbredenberg
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed element Preservation reference. Law or other regulation that determines preservation, disposal or retention. E.g. "RA-FS 2030:12".

Element type: Free text.
ConditionMin 1 character. Max 255 characters
@karinbredenberg karinbredenberg added enhancement Issues that are an enhancement needed to be evaluated and action decided DILCIS review Issues that need to go for discussion within the DILCIS Board meetings Review comment This issue originates from the review process labels Mar 11, 2019
This was referenced Mar 11, 2019
Open
Closed
@karinbredenberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Connected with #361 and #362

@karinbredenberg karinbredenberg added this to the CSIP Version 2.1 milestone Mar 19, 2019
@karinbredenberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

A convention for how to add this kind of information in for example amdSec using an existing standard in an implementer guide line is needed. This might be a local implementation of the CSIP.

This was referenced Mar 19, 2019
Open
Closed
@carlwilson
Copy link
Collaborator

This can be done locally if required but is beyond the scope of a generally applicable specification.

@shsdev shsdev mentioned this issue Jan 31, 2023
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
DILCIS review Issues that need to go for discussion within the DILCIS Board meetings enhancement Issues that are an enhancement needed to be evaluated and action decided Review comment This issue originates from the review process
Projects
None yet
Milestone
CSIP Version 2.1
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@carlwilson @karinbredenberg