You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
ISIS version(s) affected: 8.0.2, 7.1.0, 3.10.2, likely more
Description
When using the histogram tool on a neutral region of a cube with a significant number of extreme outlier pixels (enough to distort the default stretch), such as a ratio of two images with slightly mismatched shadows, the reported median and mode values are very wrong. Also the displayed histogram only contains 1-2 bars.
The included example's values are based on an actual ratio of Mercury images that was giving "median" values outside the min/max range of the selection.
The average, minimum, maximum, stand. dev., and variance values appear to be calculated correctly; the mode is apparently always identical to the median in this situation, and skew is also incorrect. It looks like median, mode, and skew are calculated using histogram bins from a global binning, while the other stats are based on the actual pixels selected.
Use the Histogram (H) tool to draw small boxes at various places in the grey region of dynamic.cub. Note that the median and mode values always match, are always either -0.121646 or 0.717249, and are often outside the min/max range of the selection. Compare to gradient.cub, where the average and median (correctly) match to within half a pixel quantization step (0.0025).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
ISIS version(s) affected: 8.0.2, 7.1.0, 3.10.2, likely more
Description
When using the histogram tool on a neutral region of a cube with a significant number of extreme outlier pixels (enough to distort the default stretch), such as a ratio of two images with slightly mismatched shadows, the reported median and mode values are very wrong. Also the displayed histogram only contains 1-2 bars.
The included example's values are based on an actual ratio of Mercury images that was giving "median" values outside the min/max range of the selection.
The average, minimum, maximum, stand. dev., and variance values appear to be calculated correctly; the mode is apparently always identical to the median in this situation, and skew is also incorrect. It looks like median, mode, and skew are calculated using histogram bins from a global binning, while the other stats are based on the actual pixels selected.
How to reproduce
Use the Histogram (H) tool to draw small boxes at various places in the grey region of dynamic.cub. Note that the median and mode values always match, are always either -0.121646 or 0.717249, and are often outside the min/max range of the selection. Compare to gradient.cub, where the average and median (correctly) match to within half a pixel quantization step (0.0025).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: