You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Could PRG(PRF(SK_t, "broad…")) also be HKDF-Expand(SK_t, "broad…", n*16)? Might be simpler than PRG+PRF with AES. With SHA-256 as underlying hash functions, HKDF-Expand still gives enough output to provide 512 16-byte chunks per day, i.e. a new EphID every 2.8 min.
We considered replacing the current construction with HKDF, but did not do so for the latest version of the whitepaper because of the relative costs of running AES and HMAC-SHA-256 inside HKDF-Expand. We plan to do further benchmarking, but note also that this issue is relevant only for the first option in the whitepaper, so is not high priority.
Could
PRG(PRF(SK_t, "broad…"))
also beHKDF-Expand(SK_t, "broad…", n*16)
? Might be simpler than PRG+PRF with AES. With SHA-256 as underlying hash functions, HKDF-Expand still gives enough output to provide 512 16-byte chunks per day, i.e. a new EphID every 2.8 min.(this is just for completeness a copy-paste of my tweet about this)
Related issues #57, #62, #72.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: