Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Dynamic Instrumentation] Normalize redaction keywords + add missing keywords #5350

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 27, 2024

Conversation

shurivich
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of changes

Normalize redaction keywords
Add missing keywords
Add unit tests

Reason for change

PII redaction was not working as expected because certain keywords weren't normalized. This update fix that issue. Additionally, after this functionality was initially introduced, some keywords were added; this update now includes them.
Also added some unit tests.

@shurivich shurivich self-assigned this Mar 26, 2024
@shurivich shurivich requested a review from a team as a code owner March 26, 2024 12:04
@shurivich shurivich changed the title [Dynamic Instrumentation] Normalize redaction keywords [Dynamic Instrumentation] Normalize redaction keywords + add missing keywords Mar 26, 2024
@datadog-ddstaging
Copy link

datadog-ddstaging bot commented Mar 26, 2024

Datadog Report

Branch report: shurivich/pii
Commit report: 85f309c
Test service: dd-trace-dotnet

✅ 0 Failed, 333371 Passed, 2057 Skipped, 43m 7.89s Wall Time

@andrewlock
Copy link
Member

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing the following branches/commits:

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program. And are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are shown in red. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.6.2) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (5350) - mean (74ms)  : 65, 83
     .   : milestone, 74,
    master - mean (73ms)  : 65, 81
     .   : milestone, 73,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (5350) - mean (1,006ms)  : 982, 1030
     .   : milestone, 1006,
    master - mean (1,004ms)  : 981, 1026
     .   : milestone, 1004,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (5350) - mean (113ms)  : 107, 119
     .   : milestone, 113,
    master - mean (111ms)  : 108, 115
     .   : milestone, 111,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (5350) - mean (726ms)  : 705, 747
     .   : milestone, 726,
    master - mean (724ms)  : 700, 749
     .   : milestone, 724,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (5350) - mean (95ms)  : 92, 97
     .   : milestone, 95,
    master - mean (94ms)  : 91, 97
     .   : milestone, 94,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (5350) - mean (679ms)  : 653, 705
     .   : milestone, 679,
    master - mean (679ms)  : 656, 702
     .   : milestone, 679,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.6.2) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (5350) - mean (188ms)  : 185, 191
     .   : milestone, 188,
    master - mean (188ms)  : 183, 193
     .   : milestone, 188,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (5350) - mean (1,078ms)  : 1056, 1100
     .   : milestone, 1078,
    master - mean (1,071ms)  : 1052, 1090
     .   : milestone, 1071,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (5350) - mean (271ms)  : 268, 274
     .   : milestone, 271,
    master - mean (270ms)  : 263, 276
     .   : milestone, 270,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (5350) - mean (868ms)  : 842, 893
     .   : milestone, 868,
    master - mean (866ms)  : 844, 888
     .   : milestone, 866,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (5350) - mean (262ms)  : 257, 266
     .   : milestone, 262,
    master - mean (260ms)  : 254, 266
     .   : milestone, 260,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (5350) - mean (855ms)  : 829, 882
     .   : milestone, 855,
    master - mean (852ms)  : 826, 877
     .   : milestone, 852,

Loading

@andrewlock
Copy link
Member

Benchmarks Report for tracer 🐌

Benchmarks for #5350 compared to master:

  • 1 benchmarks are faster, with geometric mean 1.149
  • 3 benchmarks are slower, with geometric mean 1.167
  • 1 benchmarks have more allocations

The following thresholds were used for comparing the benchmark speeds:

  • Mann–Whitney U test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 10% and 0.3 ns are considered.

Allocation changes below 0.5% are ignored.

Benchmark details

Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master StartStopWithChild net6.0 8.78μs 49ns 325ns 0.0176 0.0088 0 7.51 KB
master StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1 10.7μs 60.3ns 418ns 0.031 0.0155 0 7.6 KB
master StartStopWithChild net472 16.8μs 61.5ns 238ns 1.32 0.301 0.0835 8.04 KB
#5350 StartStopWithChild net6.0 8.59μs 40.4ns 151ns 0.0411 0.0183 0 7.5 KB
#5350 StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1 10.6μs 54.9ns 263ns 0.0307 0.0153 0.00511 7.59 KB
#5350 StartStopWithChild net472 17μs 65.6ns 246ns 1.36 0.36 0.117 8.04 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 463μs 196ns 678ns 0 0 0 2.7 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 616μs 161ns 625ns 0 0 0 2.7 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 804μs 274ns 1.06μs 0.401 0 0 3.3 KB
#5350 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 464μs 258ns 1μs 0 0 0 2.7 KB
#5350 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 592μs 160ns 600ns 0 0 0 2.7 KB
#5350 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 818μs 315ns 1.18μs 0.408 0 0 3.3 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendRequest net6.0 171μs 154ns 597ns 0.184 0 0 18.33 KB
master SendRequest netcoreapp3.1 193μs 240ns 928ns 0.193 0 0 20.49 KB
master SendRequest net472 0.000852ns 0.000448ns 0.00161ns 0 0 0 0 b
#5350 SendRequest net6.0 175μs 118ns 442ns 0.173 0 0 18.33 KB
#5350 SendRequest netcoreapp3.1 194μs 213ns 825ns 0.194 0 0 20.49 KB
#5350 SendRequest net472 0.00124ns 0.000537ns 0.00208ns 0 0 0 0 b
Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ More allocations ⚠️

More allocations ⚠️ in #5350

Benchmark Base Allocated Diff Allocated Change Change %
Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces‑net6.0 41.48 KB 41.72 KB 237 B 0.57%

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 546μs 983ns 3.81μs 0.561 0 0 41.48 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 665μs 1.34μs 5.2μs 0.329 0 0 41.69 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 870μs 3.69μs 14.3μs 8.13 2.57 0.428 53.25 KB
#5350 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 543μs 576ns 2.23μs 0.543 0 0 41.72 KB
#5350 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 669μs 1.01μs 3.78μs 0.331 0 0 41.68 KB
#5350 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 844μs 2.35μs 8.78μs 8.45 2.53 0.422 53.23 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.DbCommandBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master ExecuteNonQuery net6.0 1.17μs 0.623ns 2.41ns 0.0111 0 0 784 B
master ExecuteNonQuery netcoreapp3.1 1.58μs 5.33ns 20.6ns 0.0103 0 0 784 B
master ExecuteNonQuery net472 1.89μs 0.577ns 2.16ns 0.118 0 0 746 B
#5350 ExecuteNonQuery net6.0 1.17μs 0.634ns 2.45ns 0.0113 0 0 784 B
#5350 ExecuteNonQuery netcoreapp3.1 1.64μs 1.41ns 5.45ns 0.0106 0 0 784 B
#5350 ExecuteNonQuery net472 1.77μs 0.831ns 3ns 0.118 0 0 746 B
Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark - Slower ⚠️ Same allocations ✔️

Slower ⚠️ in #5350

Benchmark diff/base Base Median (ns) Diff Median (ns) Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch‑net6.0 1.245 1,202.72 1,497.80

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master CallElasticsearch net6.0 1.2μs 0.599ns 2.24ns 0.0138 0 0 1.01 KB
master CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1 1.62μs 0.769ns 2.98ns 0.0138 0 0 1.01 KB
master CallElasticsearch net472 2.58μs 2.45ns 9.47ns 0.162 0 0 1.02 KB
master CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0 1.47μs 1.39ns 5.19ns 0.0138 0 0 984 B
master CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.74μs 0.684ns 2.56ns 0.0138 0 0 1.06 KB
master CallElasticsearchAsync net472 2.56μs 1.96ns 7.59ns 0.17 0 0 1.08 KB
#5350 CallElasticsearch net6.0 1.5μs 1.75ns 6.77ns 0.0144 0 0 1.01 KB
#5350 CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1 1.68μs 0.743ns 2.88ns 0.0134 0 0 1.01 KB
#5350 CallElasticsearch net472 2.57μs 1.38ns 5.34ns 0.161 0 0 1.02 KB
#5350 CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0 1.46μs 1.35ns 5.06ns 0.0138 0 0 984 B
#5350 CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.69μs 0.806ns 3.02ns 0.014 0 0 1.06 KB
#5350 CallElasticsearchAsync net472 2.76μs 2.23ns 8.63ns 0.17 0 0 1.08 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master ExecuteAsync net6.0 1.26μs 1.21ns 4.51ns 0.0127 0 0 928 B
master ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.63μs 0.751ns 2.91ns 0.013 0 0 928 B
master ExecuteAsync net472 1.9μs 0.575ns 2.15ns 0.141 0 0 891 B
#5350 ExecuteAsync net6.0 1.34μs 0.438ns 1.7ns 0.0128 0 0 928 B
#5350 ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.61μs 0.968ns 3.62ns 0.0129 0 0 928 B
#5350 ExecuteAsync net472 1.97μs 0.673ns 2.61ns 0.141 0 0 891 B
Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendAsync net6.0 4.24μs 1.91ns 7.14ns 0.0298 0 0 2.16 KB
master SendAsync netcoreapp3.1 5.06μs 2.59ns 10ns 0.0352 0 0 2.7 KB
master SendAsync net472 7.61μs 4.46ns 16.1ns 0.484 0 0 3.05 KB
#5350 SendAsync net6.0 4.11μs 1.48ns 5.54ns 0.0288 0 0 2.16 KB
#5350 SendAsync netcoreapp3.1 5.06μs 3.82ns 14.8ns 0.0353 0 0 2.7 KB
#5350 SendAsync net472 7.79μs 4.07ns 15.8ns 0.483 0 0 3.05 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark - Slower ⚠️ Same allocations ✔️

Slower ⚠️ in #5350

Benchmark diff/base Base Median (ns) Diff Median (ns) Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog‑netcoreapp3.1 1.134 2,187.72 2,481.18

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 1.46μs 0.675ns 2.62ns 0.0228 0 0 1.65 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 2.19μs 0.863ns 3.23ns 0.0227 0 0 1.65 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 2.68μs 2.41ns 9.35ns 0.249 0 0 1.57 KB
#5350 EnrichedLog net6.0 1.44μs 0.656ns 2.54ns 0.0232 0 0 1.65 KB
#5350 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 2.48μs 1.67ns 6.49ns 0.0224 0 0 1.65 KB
#5350 EnrichedLog net472 2.82μs 3.01ns 11.6ns 0.249 0 0 1.57 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 111μs 77.8ns 301ns 0.0556 0 0 4.23 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 119μs 287ns 1.11μs 0.0591 0 0 4.23 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 148μs 151ns 566ns 0.665 0.222 0 4.41 KB
#5350 EnrichedLog net6.0 112μs 96.5ns 374ns 0 0 0 4.23 KB
#5350 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 119μs 228ns 884ns 0 0 0 4.23 KB
#5350 EnrichedLog net472 147μs 132ns 513ns 0.662 0.221 0 4.41 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.NLogBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 3.02μs 1.21ns 4.35ns 0.0316 0 0 2.21 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 4.15μs 2.14ns 8.27ns 0.0288 0 0 2.21 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 4.82μs 3.46ns 13.4ns 0.321 0 0 2.02 KB
#5350 EnrichedLog net6.0 2.96μs 1.3ns 4.85ns 0.0312 0 0 2.21 KB
#5350 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 4.33μs 2.19ns 8.5ns 0.0302 0 0 2.21 KB
#5350 EnrichedLog net472 5.29μs 1.14ns 4.1ns 0.321 0 0 2.02 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendReceive net6.0 1.45μs 0.621ns 2.24ns 0.0167 0 0 1.18 KB
master SendReceive netcoreapp3.1 1.79μs 0.434ns 1.56ns 0.016 0 0 1.18 KB
master SendReceive net472 2.18μs 1.17ns 4.55ns 0.187 0 0 1.18 KB
#5350 SendReceive net6.0 1.38μs 0.637ns 2.47ns 0.0166 0 0 1.18 KB
#5350 SendReceive netcoreapp3.1 1.79μs 0.86ns 3.22ns 0.0161 0 0 1.18 KB
#5350 SendReceive net472 2.25μs 2ns 7.2ns 0.186 0 0 1.18 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 2.76μs 0.804ns 2.78ns 0.0221 0 0 1.55 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 3.86μs 2.09ns 8.1ns 0.0214 0 0 1.6 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 4.51μs 3.37ns 13.1ns 0.315 0 0 1.99 KB
#5350 EnrichedLog net6.0 2.85μs 0.642ns 2.31ns 0.0214 0 0 1.55 KB
#5350 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 3.93μs 1.73ns 6.69ns 0.0217 0 0 1.6 KB
#5350 EnrichedLog net472 4.4μs 2.82ns 10.9ns 0.316 0 0 1.99 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark - Slower ⚠️ Same allocations ✔️

Slower ⚠️ in #5350

Benchmark diff/base Base Median (ns) Diff Median (ns) Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan‑netcoreapp3.1 1.125 684.89 770.39

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master StartFinishSpan net6.0 464ns 0.309ns 1.16ns 0.00761 0 0 552 B
master StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1 685ns 0.576ns 2.16ns 0.0072 0 0 552 B
master StartFinishSpan net472 803ns 1.01ns 3.64ns 0.0879 0 0 554 B
master StartFinishScope net6.0 685ns 0.886ns 3.43ns 0.00959 0 0 672 B
master StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1 872ns 0.722ns 2.8ns 0.00878 0 0 672 B
master StartFinishScope net472 977ns 1.28ns 4.95ns 0.1 0 0 634 B
#5350 StartFinishSpan net6.0 495ns 0.647ns 2.42ns 0.00778 0 0 552 B
#5350 StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1 768ns 2.83ns 10.9ns 0.0073 0 0 552 B
#5350 StartFinishSpan net472 812ns 1.06ns 4.11ns 0.0879 0 0 554 B
#5350 StartFinishScope net6.0 620ns 0.585ns 2.19ns 0.0093 0 0 672 B
#5350 StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1 912ns 2.43ns 9.43ns 0.00897 0 0 672 B
#5350 StartFinishScope net472 946ns 1.28ns 4.98ns 0.101 0 0 634 B
Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark - Faster 🎉 Same allocations ✔️

Faster 🎉 in #5350

Benchmark base/diff Base Median (ns) Diff Median (ns) Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin‑net6.0 1.149 749.78 652.59

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master RunOnMethodBegin net6.0 750ns 0.672ns 2.6ns 0.00945 0 0 672 B
master RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1 943ns 0.716ns 2.58ns 0.00918 0 0 672 B
master RunOnMethodBegin net472 1.1μs 1.29ns 4.99ns 0.101 0 0 634 B
#5350 RunOnMethodBegin net6.0 651ns 0.943ns 3.65ns 0.00948 0 0 672 B
#5350 RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1 921ns 0.928ns 3.59ns 0.00918 0 0 672 B
#5350 RunOnMethodBegin net472 1.08μs 1.58ns 6.13ns 0.101 0 0 634 B

@andrewlock
Copy link
Member

Throughput/Crank Report:zap:

Throughput results for AspNetCoreSimpleController comparing the following branches/commits:

Cases where throughput results for the PR are worse than latest master (5% drop or greater), results are shown in red.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see one of the many, many dashboards!

gantt
    title Throughput Linux x64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (5350) (11.599M)   : 0, 11598773
    master (11.234M)   : 0, 11234211
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (11.502M)   : 0, 11502400

    section Automatic
    This PR (5350) (7.992M)   : 0, 7992150
    master (7.892M)   : 0, 7892025
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (8.282M)   : 0, 8282092

    section Trace stats
    This PR (5350) (8.215M)   : 0, 8215130
    master (8.128M)   : 0, 8128046

    section Manual
    This PR (5350) (10.004M)   : 0, 10003783
    master (9.998M)   : 0, 9997703

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (5350) (7.562M)   : 0, 7561919
    master (7.509M)   : 0, 7508673

    section Version Conflict
    This PR (5350) (6.745M)   : 0, 6745413
    master (6.752M)   : 0, 6751551

Loading
gantt
    title Throughput Linux arm64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (5350) (9.658M)   : 0, 9657745
    master (9.719M)   : 0, 9719411
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (9.757M)   : 0, 9756597

    section Automatic
    This PR (5350) (4.734M)   : crit ,0, 4734157
    master (6.497M)   : 0, 6496614

    section Trace stats
    This PR (5350) (6.907M)   : 0, 6907427
    master (6.785M)   : 0, 6785156

    section Manual
    This PR (5350) (8.139M)   : 0, 8139463
    master (8.060M)   : 0, 8060205

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (5350) (6.143M)   : 0, 6142795
    master (5.959M)   : 0, 5958606

    section Version Conflict
    This PR (5350) (5.626M)   : 0, 5625942
    master (5.660M)   : 0, 5660029

Loading
gantt
    title Throughput Windows x64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (5350) (9.674M)   : 0, 9673633
    master (10.074M)   : 0, 10073856
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (9.814M)   : 0, 9813729

    section Automatic
    This PR (5350) (6.853M)   : 0, 6853231
    master (7.026M)   : 0, 7026117
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (7.278M)   : 0, 7278101

    section Trace stats
    This PR (5350) (7.159M)   : 0, 7158903
    master (7.281M)   : 0, 7281475

    section Manual
    This PR (5350) (8.372M)   : 0, 8371851
    master (8.613M)   : 0, 8613073

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (5350) (6.563M)   : 0, 6562960
    master (6.856M)   : 0, 6855748

    section Version Conflict
    This PR (5350) (5.951M)   : 0, 5950622
    master (6.081M)   : 0, 6080626

Loading

Copy link
Collaborator

@OmerRaviv OmerRaviv left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, great job on the test!

Copy link
Contributor

@GreenMatan GreenMatan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@shurivich shurivich merged commit bea28a4 into master Mar 27, 2024
61 checks passed
@shurivich shurivich deleted the shurivich/pii branch March 27, 2024 14:06
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the vNext milestone Mar 27, 2024
@andrewlock andrewlock modified the milestones: vNext, vNext-v2 Apr 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants