You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Why does the algorithm faster in the high dimensional?
I tried the algorithm using several cases (1000 points with 2-8-dimensional).
It returns results faster in low dimensional than high dimensional. Is there any reason?
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Several things can explain this depending on your data and the eps parameter you used. As the number of dimensions increases, distance between data points change. Thus, "being within eps distance" gets another meaning, which can e.g., heavily influence the calculation cost of connected component search during insertion.
IncDBSCAN is very slow when using about 70w points with 1024 dimension. The distance metric is cosine and eps is set to 0.12. Is there any solution? thanks.
Why does the algorithm faster in the high dimensional?
I tried the algorithm using several cases (1000 points with 2-8-dimensional).
It returns results faster in low dimensional than high dimensional. Is there any reason?
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: