Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why does the algorithm more faster in the high dimensional? #2

Open
Tsepu opened this issue Apr 20, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Why does the algorithm more faster in the high dimensional? #2

Tsepu opened this issue Apr 20, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@Tsepu
Copy link

Tsepu commented Apr 20, 2023

Why does the algorithm faster in the high dimensional?

I tried the algorithm using several cases (1000 points with 2-8-dimensional).
It returns results faster in low dimensional than high dimensional. Is there any reason?

Thanks

@DataOmbudsman
Copy link
Owner

Several things can explain this depending on your data and the eps parameter you used. As the number of dimensions increases, distance between data points change. Thus, "being within eps distance" gets another meaning, which can e.g., heavily influence the calculation cost of connected component search during insertion.

@KwaiYii-Center
Copy link

IncDBSCAN is very slow when using about 70w points with 1024 dimension. The distance metric is cosine and eps is set to 0.12. Is there any solution? thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants