separate copepodid stages into copepod stage ontology and add complete axioms

[cmungall]

[Term]
id: ECOCORE:00000034
name: copepodid stage 2
def: "The second post-naupliar life stage of a copepod" []
is_a: BFO:0000003 ! occurrent
is_a: UBERON:0000105 ! life cycle stage
relationship: BFO:0000063 ECOCORE:00000035 ! precedes precedes copepodid stage 3

[Term]
id: ECOCORE:00000035
name: copepodid stage 3
def: "The third post-naupliar life stage of a copepod" []
is_a: BFO:0000003 ! occurrent
is_a: UBERON:0000105 ! life cycle stage
relationship: BFO:0000063 ECOCORE:00000036 ! precedes precedes copepodid stage 4

[Term]
id: ECOCORE:00000036
name: copepodid stage 4
def: "The fourth post-naupliar life stage of a copepod" []
is_a: BFO:0000003 ! occurrent
is_a: UBERON:0000105 ! life cycle stage
relationship: BFO:0000063 ECOCORE:00000037 ! precedes precedes copepodid stage 5

[Term]
id: ECOCORE:00000037
name: copepodid stage 5
def: "The fifth post-naupliar life stage of a copepod" []
is_a: BFO:0000003 ! occurrent
is_a: UBERON:0000105 ! life cycle stage
relationship: BFO:0000063 ECOCORE:00000038 ! precedes precedes copepodid stage 6

[Term]
id: ECOCORE:00000038
name: copepodid stage 6
def: "The sixth post-naupliar life stage of a copepod" []
is_a: UBERON:0000105 ! life cycle stage

these lack text and logical definitions, and taxon constraints.

I'm not sure ecocore is the best place to house these. Uberon may be a better temporary home but I recommend adding to the family here: https://github.com/obophenotype/developmental-stage-ontologies

This may require discussion. The above repo includes about 20 different species-specific stage ontologies mostly defined by @fbastian and @ANiknejad. However, only a subset of these are registered in OBO. Do we want to carry on with this strategy of making a new ontology for every species? Perhaps we could start to bundle these, e.g by phyla? Or just fold into Uberon? cc @balhoff @matentzn @dosumis @mellybelly?

[diatomsRcool]

I'm fine with putting these in UBERON. I would prefer that actually. I think I had some troubles when I tried to add them years ago. Any other opinions?

[diatomsRcool]

obophenotype/uberon#1989

[diatomsRcool]

need to deprecate these in ECOCORE
https://oboacademy.github.io/obook/howto/obsolete-term/