Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[HOLD for payment 2024-10-10] Android – Sign in – Able to dismiss the Onboarding modal using back button #49990

Closed
1 of 6 tasks
IuliiaHerets opened this issue Oct 1, 2024 · 23 comments
Assignees
Labels
Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. Engineering Weekly KSv2

Comments

@IuliiaHerets
Copy link

IuliiaHerets commented Oct 1, 2024

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!


Version Number: 9.0.42-0
Reproducible in staging?: Y
Reproducible in production?: N
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: https://expensify.testrail.io/index.php?/tests/view/5027336
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): ponikarchuks+1311024@gmail.com
Issue reported by: Applause Internal Team

Action Performed:

  1. Go to https://staging.new.expensify.com/
  2. Log in with a new Gmail account
  3. When Onboarding modal appears tap on back button on your device few times

Expected Result:

Onboarding modal present

Actual Result:

Onboarding modal disappears

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Bug6621051_1727783731952.Signin.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

Issue OwnerCurrent Issue Owner: @alexpensify
@IuliiaHerets IuliiaHerets added DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. DeployBlocker Indicates it should block deploying the API labels Oct 1, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 1, 2024

Triggered auto assignment to @johnmlee101 (DeployBlockerCash), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/9980/ for more details.

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 1, 2024

Triggered auto assignment to @alexpensify (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Daily KSv2 label Oct 1, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added Engineering Hourly KSv2 and removed Daily KSv2 labels Oct 1, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 1, 2024

👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

  1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
  2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
  3. Fix the issue yourself.

@blazejkustra
Copy link
Contributor

I think it is connected to #49586, do you know how we prevented this in the past? @allgandalf

@johnmlee101
Copy link
Contributor

Bump @allgandalf !

@jasperhuangg
Copy link
Contributor

jasperhuangg commented Oct 1, 2024

This is a previous issue that is similar @johnmlee101 #47246

Although there it looks like they just retested and didn't experience it again so they closed it out :/

@johnmlee101
Copy link
Contributor

Seems like an inconsistent issue. Think we should remove the blocker and just create an issue to fix?

@johnmlee101
Copy link
Contributor

Or ask for a retest if someone has it up and ready?

@allgandalf
Copy link
Contributor

Or ask for a retest if someone has it up and ready?

Lets ask for a retest and if not consistent then demote, c.c. @mountiny for vizz

@allgandalf
Copy link
Contributor

Bump @allgandalf !

sorry got back just now. Looking....

@blazejkustra
Copy link
Contributor

I have a fix for it 🥳 If you look closely at the video the onboarding modal was opened twice which allowed to dismiss the modal. Here is a video when onboarding modal is opened once:

Screen.Recording.2024-10-01.at.20.05.31.mov

@blazejkustra
Copy link
Contributor

blazejkustra commented Oct 1, 2024

@johnmlee101 I was able to reproduce reliably on android, I would say it is a deploy blocker. PR ready here.

@allgandalf
Copy link
Contributor

@johnmlee101 , I approved the PR, all yours now can you update the title of that PR to [CP Staging]. thanks

@johnmlee101
Copy link
Contributor

Put the CP request

@jasperhuangg
Copy link
Contributor

QA retest request here cc @Expensify/applause

@isagoico
Copy link

isagoico commented Oct 1, 2024

Issue is not reproducible on SG S10+ or Pixel6 🎉

video_2024-10-01_17-45-48.mp4

@jasperhuangg jasperhuangg removed the DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment label Oct 1, 2024
@jasperhuangg jasperhuangg reopened this Oct 1, 2024
@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

mountiny commented Oct 2, 2024

No payments required here as the authors handled the fix, closing

@mountiny mountiny closed this as completed Oct 2, 2024
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added Weekly KSv2 Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production and removed Weekly KSv2 labels Oct 3, 2024
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot changed the title Android – Sign in – Able to dismiss the Onboarding modal using back button [HOLD for payment 2024-10-10] Android – Sign in – Able to dismiss the Onboarding modal using back button Oct 3, 2024
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Reviewing Has a PR in review label Oct 3, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 3, 2024

Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 3, 2024

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.0.43-6 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-10-10. 🎊

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 3, 2024

BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

  • [@johnmlee101] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
  • [@johnmlee101] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
  • [@johnmlee101] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
  • [@johnmlee101] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
  • [@johnmlee101] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
  • [@alexpensify] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 21, 2024

⚠️ Looks like this issue was linked to a Deploy Blocker here

If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.

If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.

If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.

@alexpensify
Copy link
Contributor

@johnmlee101 - is this notice accurate or a false alarm?

@johnmlee101
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like a false alarm, I don't see the linked issue at all

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. Engineering Weekly KSv2
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants