-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Test Accuracy is different #3
Comments
Thank you very much for using HICO-DET-SG by yourself! As we mentioned in our response to Issue #2, we updated the HICO-DET-SG after DistShift 2022. In our own evaluation of QPIC on the current HICO-DET-SG split 1, test mAP was 24.53, which is similar to yours. For more details, please refer to the revised version of the paper which is going to be submitted to arXiv this week. |
Ok, thank you very much. |
Wait, if you update. Can you mention it here? |
Sure! Thank you for your advice. |
Hi, thank you very much for your patience and sharing your results! The revised version is now available on arXiv! About your last question, I think the main reasons are the base model and the batch size. |
Ok, I used pretrained resnet-50 and get 0.271067686, 0.260221244, 0.3193315 on three HICO-DET-SG datasets, which is totally different from your new arxiv's results. I do not know what happened. |
We used ResNet-101 and batch size 16 because the original QPIC paper recommended them as the best ones. Yet, in the out-of-distribution tests in general, many factors affect the performance differently from the in-distribution tests. Could you try the following two?
|
The parameter batch-size is 8, I used two gpus. So, it's 16 images per iter in my experiment. |
Thank you very much! The conditions of our experiments are detailed in Subsection 4.2 in our preprint. If you find any other differences, please let us know. |
Hi, I train the hico-sg1 on qpic, and the testmap is 25 at 6 epoch. But in paper, it's 22.08.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: