Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ Process number needs to be added into additional places #10695

Closed
2 tasks
brindasasi opened this issue Jun 18, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #10763
Closed
2 tasks

✨ Process number needs to be added into additional places #10695

brindasasi opened this issue Jun 18, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #10763
Assignees
Labels
feature New feature or request.

Comments

@brindasasi
Copy link
Contributor

brindasasi commented Jun 18, 2024

✨ Feature

Feedback from UAT.
Basically wherever the pool has been mentioned process no should be added in there. Most of the pools have exactly same no and process no will be the only thing we have to identify them uniquely.

On the job poster process no is in the very bottom of the page which is difficult to find

🕵️ Details

Process no needs to be added in Pool Candidate table , Other Processes table and in the job poster as well
(see screenshots)

📸 Screenshot

Screenshot 2024-06-18 161048
Screenshot 2024-06-18 160335

✅ Acceptance Criteria

A set of assumptions which, when tested, verify that the feature was properly implemented.

  • Process no should be added in both places mentioned in the screenshots
  • new column Process number and it is sortable and filterable
@brindasasi brindasasi added feature New feature or request. review in refinement Ready to be looked at and pulled into "ready to dev" labels Jun 18, 2024
@Jerryescandon
Copy link

1 - Process number should already be in the candidate table as per #10579 (probably hidden by default)
2 - It's ok to add to table on candidate profile
3 - I would recommend @brindasasi and @substrae get together to discuss the specifics of the feedback and best location for this information, assuming current placement didn't work.

@gobyrne
Copy link
Member

gobyrne commented Jun 18, 2024

@Jerryescandon actually #10579 only added the Process number to the processes table :/

I don't want to put the process number in the main information of the job advertisements. I'd like to push back on that request. The advertisement is designed for applicants, not for HR.

@JoshBeveridge
Copy link
Member

Agree with @gobyrne. Definitely not moving the process number up on the job ad page - it is entirely irrelevant to the primary users of that page and will only create bloat and confusion.

@gobyrne gobyrne added the blocked: design Blocked by missing designs. label Jun 20, 2024
@brindasasi brindasasi removed blocked: design Blocked by missing designs. review in refinement Ready to be looked at and pulled into "ready to dev" labels Jun 20, 2024
@yonikid15 yonikid15 self-assigned this Jun 21, 2024
@petertgiles petertgiles changed the title ✨ Process no needs to be added into additional places ✨ Process number needs to be added into additional places Jun 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature New feature or request.
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants