Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Multi-component condensate simulations #19

Open
leios opened this issue Mar 6, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

Multi-component condensate simulations #19

leios opened this issue Mar 6, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@leios
Copy link
Member

leios commented Mar 6, 2019

We should be able to simulate multi-component BEC's

@AllenNCC
Copy link

AllenNCC commented Jun 1, 2019

Hi Leois,

Thanks for developing and maintaining the program! Will the multicomponent feature be implemented soon? I hope to simulate some spinor-bec physics. Thanks!

@leios
Copy link
Member Author

leios commented Jun 1, 2019

We just had our first tests of multicomponent systems working a few days ago, now we just need to make it usable and mess around a bit with dynamic variables. I'm traveling this week, but it's my primary focus for GPUE development the week I get back!

@AllenNCC
Copy link

AllenNCC commented Jun 1, 2019

That's awesome, thanks! In addition, I wonder if there's a feature in the ground state calculation that stops the imaginary time propagation when the wave function converges (for instance, stoping the calculation when the maximum difference of the wave function or energy difference between the previous step and the current step is less then a certain value). Thanks!

@leios
Copy link
Member Author

leios commented Jun 1, 2019

This is a feature we were thinking about adding in. It would require running the energy calculation and watching it until it levels out. In the past, we decided against this feature, because it was sometimes difficult to determine how long this would actually take when requesting time on a supercomputer for large vortex lattices. I would be willing to add this feature in after working on the dynamic variables.

Would you be able to open a new issue for this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants