-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 110
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve/clean terraform via snyk #4094
Comments
@GSA/data-gov-team This comment needs to be reviewed: If someone agrees with my assessment, we can ignore this permanently. |
@GSA/data-gov-team These comments are all the same to highlight the same problem that is repeated three times and needs to be reviewed:
If someone agrees with my assessment, we can "ignore" this permanently as "not vulnerable". |
Ignore those permanently, attaching to roles doesn't make sense in the context of a single automated user... |
Other related efforts (for datagov-brokerpak-solr specifically): |
User Story
In order to have the most secure infrastructure, data.gov admin wants a complete review of the outstanding snyk vulnerabilities across the data.gov org and resolution via fixes, ignoring, or removing scans where appropriate.
Acceptance Criteria
[ACs should be clearly demoable/verifiable whenever possible. Try specifying them using BDD.]
WHEN I look at the snyk dashboard
THEN all terraform code registers as clean
OR a specific issue is created to resolve the current state
Background
Discussed during pairing; we want to clean up the snyk dashboard and validate that our code is up to spec.
These have all been cleared and re-created to make sure they have the latest files/code.
Security Considerations (required)
Consult snyk dashboard for details.
Sketch
Examine the following projects in snyk, and any outstanding vulnerabilities. Please use pairing/review when appropriate; the goal of the snyk dashboard is to help us create secure infrastructure and use secure libraries in production. If something is being scanned that isn't relevant to that, then you can remove the scanning for that particular file (called "project" in snyk). See Dependency Scanning wiki for our details and best practices...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: