Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Surface worker requests in performance diagnostics #15448

Open
adamraine opened this issue Sep 11, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Surface worker requests in performance diagnostics #15448

adamraine opened this issue Sep 11, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@adamraine
Copy link
Member

adamraine commented Sep 11, 2023

response-compression and uses-optimized-images needed to explicitly ignore worker requests in #14212 to maintain their same behavior. That being said, we could analyze worker requests in these audits if we wanted to.

The justification for ignoring OOPIF is that developers don't have as much control over the requests in third parties (#7640 (comment)). However, web workers can be first party so it's reasonable to expect developers to optimize the requests coming from first party web workers.

Previous discussions
#7640
#7795

@adamraine
Copy link
Member Author

adamraine commented Oct 17, 2023

From discussion: We want some sort of indicator that the flagged requests are from a worker instead of the page. (e.g. DevTools adds a cog)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant