-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add --disable-dev-shm-usage to default launch flags #1834
Comments
For some reason it's not Chrome's default behavior, so I wonder what the implications are. |
I've been wondering the same :\ The flag is only on Linux but I haven't tested headful. Maybe it's not the default b/c of backward compat? |
From David:
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=736452#c65 |
Thanks Eric!
Looks like there are reasons to not use |
Oh. I read that explanation differently as "it's no big deal if you use it. Everything should be more or less the same." |
Any reason why this was suddenly implemented while the general consensus was not doing it? Correct me if I'm wrong but enabling this flag in docker containers will cause chromium to use /tmp instead of /dev/shm. Which means it will use the /tmp folder which is a regular filesystem in docker instead of /dev/shm which is shared RAM. When optimising puppeteer for high throughput, one of the limits you hit is disk IO. This specific case is easily prevented by running docker with |
@Glennvd tests I did didn't show any difference with/without the flag. Do I get it right that it hits you? How severe is the impact? We should revert this if it regresses performance. I'd also appreciate if you can share your setup, e.g. where do you run and how big is the load. |
Hey Aslushnikov, I'll see when I have time to run a clean benchmark. My setup consists of puppeteer pods running on Kubernetes. These pods autoscale to an average of 10 concurrent puppeteer requests. With an absolute max of 20, and everything higher is queued, but this only happens on very high spikes while the autoscaler needs to scale. Each puppeteer request consists of an incoming HTTP request, that starts a new chromium browser, executes the script and returns either a rendered html or a screenshot. If these pods are allocated enough CPU, the next bottleneck will be the disk IO, especially in a docker container. Running using --disable-dev-shm-usage will only impact this bottleneck further. To be honest to mitigate this bottleneck I even went further and moved the chromium profiles and chromium executable to /dev/shm completely. Since there we're multiple browsers opening/closing every second, causing repetitive disk reads and writes. This approach allowed me to scale for peaks up to 400 concurrent sessions, and if needed probably a lot higher. Now while --disable-dev-shm-usage is a perfectly valid choice when you're just running small tasks, and performance doesn't matter that much. I ultimately think this is a choice that should be left to the developer itself. Especially since not everyone is running in docker to begin with. Otherwise we might start adding flags like My proposal would be to leave these flags out of any default configuration, but add a clear FAQ with docker caveats instead. |
Curious if you tried launching chrome and reusing instances across requests? We don't recommend launching chrome per request for reasons like this. Chrome wasn't meant to be used in this way, but it's up to use to support use cases like this :) If you reconnected to chrome instead, how does the perf compare?
In fact, we do still add |
I guess the tips section has to be updated to reflect the recent change in |
Hey @Glennvd, getting back to this. Did you have a chance to see if the flag caused any perf regressions for you? |
This flag solves some issues when running chrome headless inside docker. For more details check this puppeteer issue where they discuss adding the flag to the default options as well: puppeteer/puppeteer#1834
When running chrome-driver via protractor it fails with `DevToolsActivePort file doesn't exist`, two arguments should be passed to chrome based on the discussions [here](puppeteer/puppeteer#1834), [here](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50642308/webdriverexception-unknown-error-devtoolsactiveport-file-doesnt-exist-while-t), and [here](SeleniumHQ/selenium#6049 (comment))
Someone catch such error? --disable-dev-shm-usage |
I had to set --remote-debugging-port=0 when running inside alpine linux docker to overcome this. |
@Glennvd thanks for the comment, it helps a lot!
I wanted to to ask if you finally did that and how that can be achieved. I'm interested into reduce I/O operations as well. |
In case someone else stumbles upon this in the future: I spent hours debugging issues which turned out to be caused by this flag. Due to running puppeteer with high concurrency and not enough root filesystem disk space, I was having pages crashing with |
We've just hit the same issue that @mifi mentioned. Contrary to the quotes above, |
Hey all, was this flag included by default or not? I got confused haha. |
@kathyrollo the original flag was added to be used by default:
|
Oddly enough, Puppeteer cannot find a specific element when using
ignoreDefaultArgs: [
'--disable-dev-shm-usage'
], |
There are number of issues running pptr/headless in env like Docker where resources are limited.
Shall we add
--disable-dev-shm-usage
to the default launch flags so users run into fewer issue?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: