-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Handling eid casks (location and token) #8033
Comments
I completely agree. The Maintaining an alternate tap sounds like a good idea but it would cause users to manualy add the tap before being able to install their desired id packages, right? Renaming it to |
Yes and no. It could be done with a single command, like |
These apps themselves are interesting; I was unaware. I don't have a huge objection to separate repos, though if we have one it should be an official rather than personal Tap. But isn't the fact that apps aren't always findable by token a general problem, and also the reason why we just added the We can have all of the above phrases such as "Belgium eUI" in |
Sure, I don’t mean to ignore
Those are good news. My point was I was willing to host the tap if maintainers thought it should exist but not in an official capacity, but it’s definitily better if it does. |
Yes, and I actually got pretty far in implementing this! However my design turned out lacking a good bit of abstraction. I wasn’t even aware of this problem until I was recently hit by Now that the current release allows for a Cask to have two or more names, I need to make a few more changes to my search model before I can put up the PR. |
Nice. 👍 |
This was initially a comment on #8026, but it grew so much it’s likely better suited as its own issue.
eid-mw.rb
could have a better token/name. Looking at it, it seems to be the belgian equivalent tocartao-de-cidadao.rb
(portuguese). I’m not sure how widespread this is worldwide, so for those who are not familiar with it, it’s a piece of software designed to allow the user (with an accompanying piece of hardware) to perform a number of (typically government-related) tasks directly with their ID card, right from home (like starting a company).Installing
eid-mw
, we get aneID Viewer
app, so that would already be preferable as a name.However, it concerns me that other countries might use a similar application with an identical name, and that could cause some confusion and require some changes when it happens.
It does seem to identify itself as
Belgium Identity Card
when installing, which is definitely a clearer and more descriptive name.This type of software should become gradually more popular and useful, at least in Europe, and I really like the idea of allowing users to install it via homebrew-cask (as well as uninstalling it completely, for when you don’t need it anymore). I see two good next steps, here:
eid-mw
to something likeeid-be
, andcartao-de-cidadao
(“citizen’s card”, in portuguese) toeid-pt
. We possibly create a new alternate tap for these, so they’re all neatly organised and we reduce friction in adding the rest of them. It also means they’ll have predictable names, which is good. If we go this route, I volunteer to keep the tap, in case we don’t do it officially. I like this solution because it’s hard to add all of these on our own due to different languages (and lack of knowledge of how each country distributes their respective software). In most cases we should need citizens to add these, and having a different tap with this sole goal could be helpful in publicising this possibility. It also precludes us from having to create yet another specific naming rule on the main repo.belgium-identity-card
, which is more descriptive and easier to know what it is. It also prevents the hypothetical naming conflict reference above.It should be clear I’m advocating the first solution, but I’m not sure it’s a valuable idea overall, so I’d like some opinions, @caskroom/maintainers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: