Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Definition types #2

Open
3 tasks
mkualquiera opened this issue May 19, 2020 · 0 comments
Open
3 tasks

Definition types #2

mkualquiera opened this issue May 19, 2020 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@mkualquiera
Copy link
Member

mkualquiera commented May 19, 2020

Summary

While thinking in the shower, I realized that the language can be much more expandable if an arbitrary number of definition types is allowed.
In the implementation, this is reflected by definitions having a Word field that indicates their type.

Value

The language is better and easier to implement if this is the case

Specification

  • Put more thought into it.
  • Add the changes to the project specification: it should be stated that definitions can have any type, and this type is specified as a word.
  • Increase spec version.
@mkualquiera mkualquiera added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers labels May 19, 2020
@mkualquiera mkualquiera self-assigned this May 19, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant