Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Old-style and proportional figures #418

Closed
lyvrus opened this issue Dec 22, 2021 · 7 comments · Fixed by #555 or #562
Closed

Old-style and proportional figures #418

lyvrus opened this issue Dec 22, 2021 · 7 comments · Fixed by #555 or #562
Assignees

Comments

@lyvrus
Copy link

lyvrus commented Dec 22, 2021

Do you have any plans to add them in Sans and Serif?

@BoldMonday
Copy link
Collaborator

Yes. Oldstyle figures are currently in development for all styles (Sans, Mono, Serif). All on tabular width though – no proportional versions. Updated fonts will be released during the new year.

@mjabbink
Copy link
Contributor

@lyvrus They are going to be a nice addition.

@mjabbink
Copy link
Contributor

@BoldMonday @vpicone Are these are included in the upcoming releases?

@BoldMonday
Copy link
Collaborator

@mjabbink The numerals in question are done and currently we’re working on adding a few other glyphs to the Latin fonts. When these are all done we’ll submit an update.

@mjabbink mjabbink removed the future label Mar 22, 2022
@mjabbink
Copy link
Contributor

@vpicone Please provide a SitRep.

@mjabbink mjabbink removed the future label Jun 9, 2022
@tay1orjones
Copy link
Member

Hey there! v6.1.0 was just released that references this issue.

Comment here or join the release discussion to provide feedback or voice concerns. Thanks!

@tay1orjones
Copy link
Member

Hey there! v6.3.0 was just released that references this issue.

Comment here or join the release discussion to provide feedback or voice concerns. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants