Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Country pages - Context and Structure - FDRS data incorrectly displayed #1396

Closed
tovari opened this issue Sep 30, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed
Assignees
Labels
DFS DFS team works on it

Comments

@tovari
Copy link

tovari commented Sep 30, 2024

National Society Indicators are currently not displaying the correct values on the GO country pages.

Example: Belize https://go.ifrc.org/countries/31/ns-overview/context-and-structure

image

Branches: It currently displays KPI_noLocalUnits, but it should display KPI_noBranches (we added the number of branches as of this year [2023])
Youth (6-29 yrs): Should be 20? (KPI_PeopleVol_Tot_age_18_29 + KPI_Pstaff_Tot_age_18_29 = 18 +2 = 20 )

I think generally something goes wrong with the disaggregation’s here: There is no 13-17, nor 70-79 reported.

image

image

Source: All this data is from 2022, not 2023.

@tovari tovari added the type: bug Something isn't working label Sep 30, 2024
@susilnem
Copy link
Member

susilnem commented Oct 1, 2024

Hey @tovari,

  1. For branches, we're currently using KPI_noLocalUnits since KPI_noBranches has not yet been updated in the FDRS APIs.

  2. For the Youth category (ages 6-29), we are using following formula:

Youth (6-29 years) = KPI_PeopleVol_Tot_age_6_12 + KPI_PeopleVol_Tot_age_13_17 + KPI_PeopleVol_Tot_age_18_29 + KPI_PStaff_Tot_age_18_29

Should we make any change to the calculation?

  1. Regarding volunteer disaggregation, we're utilizing the available data from FDRS, and for any missing data, we're relying on figures from previous years. If we show the data from a specific year or latest year, there are chances that the data might not be available. And the chart might be null.

For the year, we are currently showing the latest year from available data.

Should we make any changes to the current implementations?

cc @samshara @udaynwa @frozenhelium @thenav56

@tovari
Copy link
Author

tovari commented Oct 2, 2024

hey @susilnem,

  1. For branches, we're currently using KPI_noLocalUnits since KPI_noBranches has not yet been updated in the FDRS APIs.

So, it has been just updated (KPI_noBranches) in the Data2 FDRS API (note that we only started collecting this information for 2023)

  1. For the Youth category (ages 6-29), we are using following formula:
    Youth (6-29 years) = KPI_PeopleVol_Tot_age_6_12 + KPI_PeopleVol_Tot_age_13_17 + KPI_PeopleVol_Tot_age_18_29 + KPI_PStaff_Tot_age_18_29
    Should we make any change to the calculation?

The logic of this calculation is correct! But from some digging, it looks like you are mixing and matching disaggregation from different years. I would recommend you stick to 2022 only if that is the latest year available. For example for Belize, It looks like “KPI_PeopleVol_Tot_age_13_17” is from 2021, the other age groups are from 2022,

  1. Regarding volunteer disaggregation, we're utilizing the available data from FDRS, and for any missing data, we're relying on figures from previous years. If we show the data from a specific year or latest year, there are chances that the data might not be available. And the chart might be null.
    It seems that GO is taking for Belize, volunteers aging 70-79 from 2019 (2), volunteers aging 13-18 from 2021 (5), and the Total number of volunteers from 2022 (86), showing the data source is FDRS 2023.
    Recommend you stick to values of only 1 year for all (FDRS) numbers displayed on the country page
    For the year, we are currently showing the latest year from available data.
    Yes this makes sense!
    Recommend you change the source_year_value to the latest year, so 2022 if it is 2022 data, 2023 if it is 2023 data, et cetera.

@tovari
Copy link
Author

tovari commented Oct 16, 2024

@samshara, regarding the incomplete data from the latest available year: we can take data from the latest year, where the missing data is available. We need to indicate the year at the source info (e.g. Belize RC on FDRS, 2022, 2023, 2024) in such case.
We should not fill missing disaggregated data though (e.g. gender/age group data from different years - all these should be taken from the same year).

@samshara
Copy link
Member

@samshara, regarding the incomplete data from the latest available year: we can take data from the latest year, where the missing data is available. We need to indicate the year at the source info (e.g. Belize RC on FDRS, 2022, 2023, 2024) in such case. We should not fill missing disaggregated data though (e.g. gender/age group data from different years - all these should be taken from the same year).

@tovari we have created two tickets to address this issue

@tnagorra tnagorra added DFS DFS team works on it and removed type: bug Something isn't working labels Nov 21, 2024
@tovari tovari closed this as completed Nov 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
DFS DFS team works on it
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants