Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug] Usage of Appointment resource in $find operation #34

Closed
1 task done
sa-bre opened this issue Aug 19, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #42
Closed
1 task done

[Bug] Usage of Appointment resource in $find operation #34

sa-bre opened this issue Aug 19, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #42
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@sa-bre
Copy link

sa-bre commented Aug 19, 2024

Contact Details

samuel.brendler@naboto.com

Section Number

2:3.115 Find Potential Appointments [ITI-115]

What is wrong

In the $find operation the Appointment resource is used in the response. We are currently working on a national IG for appointment scheduling in Austria and thus are curious what the reasons for using Appointment instead of the Slot resource are.
Are there any particular advantages which lead to this decision?

Also we noticed that in the introduction the usage of the Slot resource is mentioned. To us it was not completely clear if the $find operation is meant to replace the Slot-based availability check described in R4 Appointment ("Checking Availability on the Schedule (optional) ") or if it is just meant as an additional way.

Describe the solution you'd like

No response

Relevant log output

No response

Priority

{"Low"=>"Typo or other minor classification that an editor can manage. Requires no group discussion."}

Code of Conduct

  • I agree to follow the IHE Code of Conduct
@sa-bre sa-bre added the bug Something isn't working label Aug 19, 2024
@sa-bre sa-bre changed the title [Comment] Usage of Appointment resource in $find operation [Bug] Usage of Appointment resource in $find operation Sep 6, 2024
@vassilpeytchev vassilpeytchev linked a pull request Oct 22, 2024 that will close this issue
5 tasks
@vassilpeytchev vassilpeytchev mentioned this issue Oct 22, 2024
5 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
1 participant