-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Show entries that are not within a group (within a separate group) #7871
Comments
One can see a non-group item when using the ALL ENTRIES group and checking the group colour. No colour means: The entry is not assigned to a group. Entries that have a group entry in the bib file, but that very group has not been created in JabRef yet, will show up, as if they do not belong to a group (no colour). Tested with: |
Workaround:
Also I personally liked to include readstatus, because I have some groups that do not have a group field, they get grouped by field Maybe the workaround can be adapted internally to create a standard group for entries that are not yet within a group. |
Note, that this is very similar to the problem described in #4237 |
@ThiloteE, @koppor, could you check if the issue should be closed after we added the "invert groups" toggle (#11510, #9073)? If you want to view all entries that don't belong to any group, set the groups view mode to "union" and select all groups (Ctrl + A) in the groups pane. Exclude the "all entries" group from the selection, then enable the invert toggle. This will show all entries that don’t belong to any group. |
I do have groups based on free search expressions that show in the groups pane, but are technically "not a group", as they do not have a groups field in biblatex source. Toggling the "invert" button while having this group selected will NOT show only entries without groups. We have users that have thousands of groups in the groups pane. Those users will have a tough time finding and excluding those groups based on free search expression. From a user point of view, having a separate toggle or a special group or adding an option in the "add groups" window is still a high value addition to JabRef. |
BUT, maybe the floating mode will solve this issue. |
JabRef 5.3--2021-07-02--eed637a
Windows 10 10.0 amd64
Java 16.0.1
JavaFX 16+8
The Problem:
In a large database with many entries and many groups, it is hard to find entries that are duplicates and/or not attached to a specific project and or group. I am frustrated when i have to go through all the entries by hand as this takes a long time.
This becomes increasingly important if one deletes a group (for whatever reason).
Describe the solution you'd like
Show entries that are not within a group in a separate group AND/OR add a function to "delete group with all entries that are within this group".
Additional context
Here the video why this is important. I also find that the duplicate manager is a powerful tool, but can be quite the hassle to work with.
2021-07-04.18-51-24-1.mp4
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: