FoundationDB as Storage Backend: still feasible and advisable ? #3640
Replies: 1 comment
-
You've posted the same question in three different places: JanusGraph/janusgraph-foundationdb#62, #1048 (comment) and here. Please don't do that. It won't make it more likely that you get a response, but it will annoy people following the project as they now get three notifications for the same issue instead of one. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I'm interested to know the state of the JanusGraph-FoundationDB Storage Adapter:
4 years ago it was announced : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQM_ZPZy8Ck&list=PLU8TPe7k8z9ew5W6YpACnGvjBDYaJVORZ&index=1
and, according to the
README
: https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph-foundationdb the storage adapter is compatible only for theJanusGraph
version0.5.2
withFoundationDB
version6.2.22
, while the latestJanusGraph
version is0.6.3
and the latestFoundationDB
version is7.2
(https://apple.github.io/foundationdb/ )Since I don' see
FoundationDB
listed in storage backends, and there is no official JanusGraph documentation about FoundationDB as Backend Storage,
I would like to know if it is still feasible, and, more importantly, advisable, to use
FoundationDB
asstorage backend
forJanusGraph
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions