Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Do we really need a training_losses fallback? #153

Open
ablaom opened this issue Jul 6, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Do we really need a training_losses fallback? #153

ablaom opened this issue Jul 6, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@ablaom
Copy link
Member

ablaom commented Jul 6, 2022

We already have supports_training_losses. It also seems that documentation does not require the fallback, but this should be checked.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@ablaom