Skip to content

Actions: JuliaApproximation/SemiclassicalOrthogonalPolynomials.jl

Actions

All workflows

Actions

Loading...
Loading

Showing runs from all workflows
707 workflow runs
707 workflow runs

Filter by Event

Filter by Status

Filter by Branch

Filter by Actor

Constructing with t = 1 and c non-integer takes an insanely long time TagBot #456: Issue comment #119 (comment) created by TSGut
August 5, 2024 18:31 2s
August 5, 2024 18:31 2s
CompatHelper CompatHelper #5595: Scheduled
August 5, 2024 01:25 2m 26s master
master
August 5, 2024 01:25 2m 26s
CompatHelper CompatHelper #5594: Scheduled
August 4, 2024 01:36 2m 31s master
master
August 4, 2024 01:36 2m 31s
CompatHelper CompatHelper #5593: Scheduled
August 3, 2024 01:22 2m 25s master
master
August 3, 2024 01:22 2m 25s
CompatHelper CompatHelper #5592: Scheduled
August 2, 2024 01:23 2m 44s master
master
August 2, 2024 01:23 2m 44s
CompatHelper CompatHelper #5591: Scheduled
August 1, 2024 01:37 2m 47s master
master
August 1, 2024 01:37 2m 47s
Implement weighted conversion between b=-1 polynomials TagBot #455: Issue comment #118 (comment) created by codecov bot
July 31, 2024 15:21 3s
July 31, 2024 15:21 3s
Implement weighted conversion between b=-1 polynomials CI #440: Pull request #118 opened by DanielVandH
July 31, 2024 15:10 11m 15s DanielVandH:weightnegb1
DanielVandH:weightnegb1
July 31, 2024 15:10 11m 15s
CompatHelper CompatHelper #5590: Scheduled
July 31, 2024 01:10 2m 27s master
master
July 31, 2024 01:10 2m 27s
Infinite loop in SemiclassicalJacobi(t, a, b, c, P) constructor TagBot #454: Issue comment #116 (comment) created by DanielVandH
July 30, 2024 15:11 2s
July 30, 2024 15:11 2s
Infinite loop in SemiclassicalJacobi(t, a, b, c, P) constructor TagBot #453: Issue comment #116 (comment) created by TSGut
July 30, 2024 15:06 2s
July 30, 2024 15:06 2s
Fix constructing from b=-1 TagBot #452: Issue comment #117 (comment) created by codecov bot
July 30, 2024 11:47 2s
July 30, 2024 11:47 2s
Fix constructing from b=-1 CI #439: Pull request #117 opened by DanielVandH
July 30, 2024 11:36 9m 57s DanielVandH:constructnegb1
DanielVandH:constructnegb1
July 30, 2024 11:36 9m 57s
CompatHelper CompatHelper #5589: Scheduled
July 30, 2024 01:24 2m 22s master
master
July 30, 2024 01:24 2m 22s
CompatHelper CompatHelper #5588: Scheduled
July 29, 2024 01:25 3m 3s master
master
July 29, 2024 01:25 3m 3s
CompatHelper CompatHelper #5587: Scheduled
July 28, 2024 01:35 2m 38s master
master
July 28, 2024 01:35 2m 38s
CompatHelper CompatHelper #5586: Scheduled
July 27, 2024 01:22 2m 32s master
master
July 27, 2024 01:22 2m 32s
CompatHelper CompatHelper #5585: Scheduled
July 26, 2024 01:23 2m 36s master
master
July 26, 2024 01:23 2m 36s
CompatHelper CompatHelper #5584: Scheduled
July 25, 2024 01:23 2m 30s master
master
July 25, 2024 01:23 2m 30s
Why do we still use Lanczos for c ≠ integer? TagBot #451: Issue comment #114 (comment) created by TSGut
July 24, 2024 19:11 2s
July 24, 2024 19:11 2s
Why do we still use Lanczos for c ≠ integer? TagBot #450: Issue comment #114 (comment) created by dlfivefifty
July 24, 2024 19:09 2s
July 24, 2024 19:09 2s
Why do we still use Lanczos for c ≠ integer? TagBot #449: Issue comment #114 (comment) created by TSGut
July 24, 2024 19:08 2s
July 24, 2024 19:08 2s
Why do we still use Lanczos for c ≠ integer? TagBot #448: Issue comment #114 (comment) created by dlfivefifty
July 24, 2024 18:55 2s
July 24, 2024 18:55 2s
Why do we still use Lanczos for c ≠ integer? TagBot #447: Issue comment #114 (comment) created by TSGut
July 24, 2024 15:44 2s
July 24, 2024 15:44 2s
Why do we still use Lanczos for c ≠ integer? TagBot #446: Issue comment #114 (comment) created by dlfivefifty
July 24, 2024 10:26 2s
July 24, 2024 10:26 2s