You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I started with the most obvious problem JuliaRegistries/General#10451, but looking at the Compat.toml for DataFrames.jl, there seem to be other problems as well:
There are other bounds that end in -*, those should probably all be bounded properly.
Starting with DataFrames.jl 0.14, there are quite a number of versions that declare themselves compatible with any pre 1.0 Tables version. Is that right? Presumably Tables 0.2 was breaking? Not sure, but might be worth checking that as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
See JuliaRegistries/General#10472. I am not sure about exact bounds on Tables 0.2 release (this probably would require a lot of tests to make sure we set bounds correctly for each version), but I think it is enough to make sure that we guarantee that Julia does not install an older version of DataFrames.jl instead of the latest release.
It would be good if the bounds for DataFrames.jl in the registry could be cleaned up.
I started with the most obvious problem JuliaRegistries/General#10451, but looking at the
Compat.toml
for DataFrames.jl, there seem to be other problems as well:-*
, those should probably all be bounded properly.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: