Can we prettify how methods are printed as in #36026?

[singularitti]

The current output of ClearStacktrace.jl is pretty good. I just wonder if the same technique discussed in #36026 can be used on how methods are printed in methods and methodswith? Considering the different result types of them, maybe we need to redefine how methods are shown?

julia> methodswith(Int) |> typeof
Array{Method,1}

julia> methods(Int) |> typeof
Base.MethodList

[thofma]

Related: https://github.com/chris-b1/MethodsFor.jl

[singularitti]

Related: https://github.com/chris-b1/MethodsFor.jl

Thank you, cool package! Though it still does not solve my concern: its printed message is not detailed, no types, no function locations, etc.

[User-764Q]

Thanks for raising this issue.

The output is still as you described in Julia 1.6.2, is there a useful label you could apply to the issue to help more people find it?

Matt.

[laborg]

In a sense a duplicate of #30110

[vtjnash]

Will be closed by #40251