Add a wiki: Bloodborne

[BloodyCrowOfCringeHurst]

Link to origin wiki: https://bloodborne.wiki.fextralife.com/Bloodborne+Wiki
Link to destination (independent) wiki: http://bloodborne.wikidot.com/

[Enraric]

Bloodborne also has a fandom wiki that needs to be redirected away from: https://bloodborne.fandom.com/wiki/Bloodborne

[Tenyryas]

The preferred independent wiki would probably be https://www.bloodborne-wiki.com instead, really.

[chocmake]

The preferred independent wiki would probably be https://www.bloodborne-wiki.com instead, really.

Since I see page number comparisons appear in prior proposals here, it appears this has more pages than the Wikidot version. 1023 vs 471, respectively (sourced via both sites' sitemap pages). Also apparently updated regularly.

[ofsaleem]

anecdotally, most people seem to think that bloodborne-wiki is the best one (https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/805577-bloodborne/74742440 https://www.reddit.com/r/bloodborne/comments/glj86g/about_bloodborne_wiki/ etc), but also the wikidot one is locked just like the dark souls ones (#236). i would vote for bloodborne-wiki myself

[SnorlaxMonster]

https://www.bloodborne-wiki.com doesn't appear to actually be a wiki—it's a Blogger site run by a single person. If you click the "Edit" button on any page, you're taken to the Contact page which says

This small community wiki is, due to its format, solely edited by me (Meph). If you found any error or would like to add anything please contact me by any means included below. Thank you, it is greatly appreciated.

I believe that site fails the first criterion for inclusion.

The wiki should be editable by the public (that's what makes a wiki a wiki!)