We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
_save_metrics
solve()
but that's not the case when we're re-planning.
expensive way to reproduce:
python predicators/main.py --env sticky_table_tricky_floor --approach active_sampler_learning --experiment_id grid_row-planning_progress_explore --debug --strips_learner oracle --sampler_learner oracle --bilevel_plan_without_sim True --max_initial_demos 0 --sampler_mlp_classifier_max_itr 100000 --mlp_classifier_balance_data False --pytorch_train_print_every 10000 --active_sampler_learning_model myopic_classifier_mlp --active_sampler_learning_use_teacher False --online_nsrt_learning_requests_per_cycle 1 --max_num_steps_interaction_request 1000 --num_online_learning_cycles 10 --active_sampler_learning_explore_length_base 100000 --sesame_task_planner fdopt-costs --explorer active_sampler --active_sampler_explore_task_strategy planning_progress --seed 456 --execution_monitor expected_atoms
then look at the average number of predicates; it will be ridiculously high and non-constant, even though we're not predicate learning
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
but that's not the case when we're re-planning.
expensive way to reproduce:
then look at the average number of predicates; it will be ridiculously high and non-constant, even though we're not predicate learning
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: