Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add option to classify components based on their correlation with regressors #1009

Closed
eurunuela opened this issue Nov 24, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1064
Closed

Add option to classify components based on their correlation with regressors #1009

eurunuela opened this issue Nov 24, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1064
Labels
effort: high More than 40h total work enhancement issues describing possible enhancements to the project impact: high Enhancement or functionality improvement that will affect most users priority: low issues that are not urgent

Comments

@eurunuela
Copy link
Collaborator

Summary

Stems off #879. A number of users have mentioned in the past they would love tedana to consider regressors (good and bad) to better classify ICA components.

Additional Detail

With the new decision tree, it should be approachable to add a node that takes a regressor file with some other arguments and compares them with the ICA component time series. Then based on a threshold applied to correlation values, tedana could classify components as accepted or rejected. This could also be extended to maps in the future.

@eurunuela eurunuela added enhancement issues describing possible enhancements to the project priority: low issues that are not urgent effort: high More than 40h total work impact: high Enhancement or functionality improvement that will affect most users labels Nov 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
effort: high More than 40h total work enhancement issues describing possible enhancements to the project impact: high Enhancement or functionality improvement that will affect most users priority: low issues that are not urgent
Projects
None yet
1 participant