Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] LootBox System for Cosmetics #58

Open
Drxvz opened this issue Sep 10, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

[Feature Request] LootBox System for Cosmetics #58

Drxvz opened this issue Sep 10, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
feature request New feature or request

Comments

@Drxvz
Copy link

Drxvz commented Sep 10, 2022

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
No

Describe the solution you'd like
The optimal idea I was thinking about was to add the plugin's own LootBox system so that cosmetics could be divided into purchasable and findable via lootbox.

If it can't be done it doesn't matter. :)

@Drxvz Drxvz added the feature request New feature or request label Sep 10, 2022
@MherZaqaryan
Copy link
Owner

Thanks for the suggestion, how you would like it to work? And can you please suggest any LootBox plugins to which I can add support?

@Drxvz
Copy link
Author

Drxvz commented Sep 24, 2022

Thanks for the suggestion, how you would like it to work? And can you please suggest any LootBox plugins to which I can add support?

I was thinking of a lootbox system similar to hypixel's with a 3d layout.
If you want to get clear previews, go to hypixel so you can get a good understanding of how it works.

There would be the ProLootChest plugin, but unfortunately it has rather "poor" coding and is quite buggy and limited with the customization aspect.
So to get around this minor flaw, I was thinking it might be nice to add it directly to the Bw1058-Cosmetics plugin so that it has its own lootbox system.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature request New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants