diff --git a/meetings/2017-06-01.md b/meetings/2017-06-01.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..42751332 --- /dev/null +++ b/meetings/2017-06-01.md @@ -0,0 +1,140 @@ +# Node.js Foundation TSC Meeting 2017-06-01 +## Links +* Date: June 1, 2017 +* Next meeting: June 22, 2017 +* **GitHub Issue**: [TSC#277](https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/issues/277) +* **Minutes Google Doc**: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-2V2dZKQzw-2Nyzef4y-vjzdkvPYKYjOgKONdsaNHCw +* Previous Minutes Google Doc: + +## Present +* Bryan Hughes @nebrius (TSC) +* James M Snell @jasnell (TSC) +* Mikeal Rogers @mikeal (observer/Node.js Foundation) +* Rod Vagg @rvagg (TSC) +* Michael Dawson @mhdawson (TSC) +* Jenn Turner @renrutnnej (observer) +* Tracy Hinds @hackygolucky (observer/Node.js Foundation) +* Myles Borins @MylesBorins (observer/TSC nominee) + +## Agenda +Extracted from **tsc-agenda** labelled issues and pull requests +from the **nodejs org** prior to the meeting. + +### nodejs/readable-stream + +* Bring string_decoder into the foundation + [#272](https://github.com/nodejs/readable-stream/issues/272) + +### nodejs/TSC + +* Request to move moderation responsibilities to CommComm + [#270](https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/issues/270) +* Request: Additional 2017 Travel Fund Allocation + [#250](https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/issues/250) +* Copyright Date [#195](https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/issues/195) +* Clarify which people should be org owners + [#125](https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/issues/125) +* Regular roll-up reporting for active working groups + [#109](https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/issues/109) + +## Minutes + +### Alternate meeting tool + +* Michael proposed we switch to hangouts so that we can + have live broadcasts/recording. +* Myles to investigate meet as something which would + possibly even be better +* For now we'll switch over to hangouts for the next + meeting until Myles reports. + +### Bring string_decoder into the foundation [#272](https://github.com/nodejs/readable-stream/issues/272) + +* There are no objections from the CTC. Added comment to TSC issue + [#260}(https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/issues/260) to say will + Be considered to be approved unless there are objections by Monday June 5. + +### Request to move moderation responsibilities to CommComm[#270](https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/issues/270) + +* Bryan, was to support the potential re-org of the TSC +* James, there is an alternate PR for joint responsibility of moderation + TSC and community committee +* Myles, one thing that has worked well is the moderation repo. + Transparency/openness is very important. Need to make sure we + don't lose parts that are working well. +* Bryan, do need to formalize escalation process. +* Rod, earlier discussions in comcom was to help set process/not own + This is about moving responsibility. +* Bryan yes. +* Rod, the people who get to make the decisions on the group should + Be made by the group. So in this case, potential issue because + The comcom team does not come out of the technical team. Really + only concerned with github and technical team as opposed to other + Channels. +* Myles, initial discussion was that it would be up to each of the + teams/repos to accept moderation guidelines. +* Mikeal, moderation cannot really be delegated as it must be done + by the group but the issue may be the escalation policy. +* James, ideally the moderation policy would be consistent across + The repos. That's why suggested to have joint ownership and + Escalation would be to both TSC and ComCom. +* Bryan, a lot of merits to making it joint. +* Bryan, specifically what the proposal would entail if it was to + Move to comcom, docs would move to comcom repo, tweaks to TSC and + Comcom charter. +* Mikeal, key thing is really where the escalation goes and currently + that is only to TSC even though some of the repos are now + Under comcom. +* Brian, TSC has been slow to do the moderation work,people in comcom + may be more active in doing work. +* Mikeal, we already have people that moderate across the repos. + De-escalation is the largest part of the work. +* James, proposal he put on table, moderators are from the + collaborators from the project. +* Rodd, key thing is that doers have the influence over the things + that impact them. +* Mikeal, 2 different things in the proposal to restructure TSC, + representation and admin/groups. +* Myles, one of the issues was community internally and externally. + New role of the TSC, place for WGs to come together to share info + and hold other groups accountable for their actions. + +### How to progress the discussion on governance + +* Rod, How to make it more digestable +* Mikeal, there are several issues and hard to discuss one at a time +* Rod, can we open up to a larger group for discussion. +* James, became complicated due to a larger number of comments from a + smallish number of people. +* Myles, suggested a google doc versus a PR as living doc, that + anybody can modify and actions can be assigned. +* Mikeal, thread about representative structure. +* Myles, believe most people are ok, but smaller group don't like + core having less say. 2nd point pushback from WGs that it would + Generate more work/admin. Myles believes this is a way to bring + more people in to contribute to decisions. +* and more discussion. +* open a new thread about how to move forward without getting into + low level details. Not tied to any proposal. Refining goals and + current problems. +* Tracy, suggest it might be good to find way to get neutral + third party as moderator. + +### Request: Additional 2017 Travel Fund Allocation [#250](https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/issues/250) + +No objections so James to move forward. + +### rest of issues + +We agreed to roll over the issues to the next meeting as we +ran out of time. + +## Q/A + +None, since we were not streaming. + +## Next Meeting + +Node.js Foundation calendar: + +Next meeting: 2017-06-15 2000 UTC (Thursday 1pm US Pacific).