You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. #270 suggests the option to assign "None" to the wake deflection model choice, which then skips those calculations. This can further speed up computations for when we are not interested in wake deflection.
Describe the solution you'd like
Ability to assign None to the wake deflection submodel. Perhaps something similar for other submodel types, such as the local turbulence model and perhaps even the wake deficit model, assuming it is simple to do.
Describe alternatives you've considered
N/A
Additional context
N/A
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think a scalar 0.0 will work but that should be double checked. If not, you could get grid.x in the prepare function and use that to get the right shape for np.zeros().
@rafmudaf this is exactly what I have implemented. I was just struggling with GitHub and pushing up that branch to my fork, but essentially that is what I did for the deflection, deficit and added turbulence models.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
#270 suggests the option to assign "None" to the wake deflection model choice, which then skips those calculations. This can further speed up computations for when we are not interested in wake deflection.
Describe the solution you'd like
Ability to assign
None
to the wake deflection submodel. Perhaps something similar for other submodel types, such as the local turbulence model and perhaps even the wake deficit model, assuming it is simple to do.Describe alternatives you've considered
N/A
Additional context
N/A
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: