-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 240
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[DOC] Supported ops page differentiate type supported in key vs passed along #2102
Comments
PR #3011 adds this information for types that cannot be usued as join keys in sort-merge, hash, and broadcast joins. @tgravescs is that sufficient to address this issue or are there other types that need clarification? |
so that sounds sufficient for joins but I wonder about other operations like hashAggregate, sorting, union, etc... |
We can do the same thing for all of them. It is mostly a question of should the framework have a more generic way to do this, or should we add in one off solutions.
So The difference would be something like
vs
|
The latter / more generic approach that @revans2 mentions above seems like the better way to go. |
Report incorrect documentation
The supported ops page doesn't seem to indicate if a type is supposed as the main key (like joining on) vs just being able to be passed along as another columns. Perhaps we should add a note for this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: