Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WYZE v3 (T31) exposure problems in the daytime #102

Open
mariarti opened this issue Feb 14, 2023 · 5 comments · Fixed by OpenIPC/firmware#1073
Open

WYZE v3 (T31) exposure problems in the daytime #102

mariarti opened this issue Feb 14, 2023 · 5 comments · Fixed by OpenIPC/firmware#1073
Assignees
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed ingenic majestic

Comments

@mariarti
Copy link

Required information

  • WYZE v3 sensor gc2053
  • Majestic lite HEAD+eba3d1e, 2023-02-11
  • OpenIPC version: master+98e3bca7, 2023-02-11
  • installation method: autoupdated
  • modified majestic.yaml: no

Issue description

Exposure problems in the daytime.
At night / cloudy time the picture is normal.

Expectations

Good picture at any time of day (any lighting scene)

Steps to reproduce

  1. Just turn on

Information to attach

openipc-2 3 02 11-lite-t31zx-gc2053-1676393102-snapshot4cron
openipc-2 3 02 11-lite-t31zx-gc2053-1676392202-snapshot4cron
openipc-2 3 02 11-lite-t31zx-gc2053-1676389501-snapshot4cron

Assumption https://t.me/c/1223369578/13838

@mariarti mariarti changed the title Exposure problems in the daytime WYZE v3 (T31) exposure problems in the daytime Feb 14, 2023
@flyrouter flyrouter added help wanted Extra attention is needed majestic ingenic labels Feb 14, 2023
@flyrouter
Copy link
Member

@dimerr
Please see this problem, what we can fix here.
This is our chance to run a popular device, very many hits.

@dimerr
Copy link
Collaborator

dimerr commented Feb 15, 2023

take gc2053.bin from stock fw and try

@ialexlog
Copy link

Replacing gc2053.bin does not give the desired result. The only difference is the absence of the pink ring in the middle of the snapshot, and that's it.

As it was found, this particular kind of highlighting is caused by the snapshot script. If a snapshot is taken externally (e.g., curl, wget), the problem does not manifest itself. The assumption was made that there is not enough memory when the script is called. This is most likely the case.
At the moment a workaround in the form of an external snapshot rather than directly from the camera is used.
I would be happy for it to work normally without any workarounds.

@gtxaspec
Copy link

gtxaspec commented Oct 5, 2023

This PR OpenIPC/firmware#966 has fixed exposure issues for me. Maybe you can try the latest master and see if you still have issues.

@damienwolf07
Copy link

damienwolf07 commented Apr 30, 2024

Replacing gc2053.bin does not give the desired result. The only difference is the absence of the pink ring in the middle of the snapshot, and that's it.

As it was found, this particular kind of highlighting is caused by the snapshot script. If a snapshot is taken externally (e.g., curl, wget), the problem does not manifest itself. The assumption was made that there is not enough memory when the script is called. This is most likely the case.
At the moment a workaround in the form of an external snapshot rather than directly from the camera is used.
I would be happy for it to work normally without any workarounds.

Ah, For the snapshot script, I have found out that its when we pull the sensor model, Is when the flash occurs.
I would guess when we pull the sensor model (the command that returns 'gc2053') the sensor is temporarily stopped so we can get it's model, Thus ruining the auto exposure loop. A workaround for me was making the sensor model variable static.

EDIT: This command is run before we take a snapshot, So it takes a snapshot while the exposure goes back to normal.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed ingenic majestic
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

6 participants