Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

6.0 Feedback: mounts described as "empty" when they aren't or don't need to be #10094

Closed
ecormany opened this issue Apr 26, 2022 · 7 comments
Closed
Assignees
Labels
6.0-feedback Feedback for the 6.0 release complete Completely resolved and/or verified fixed.

Comments

@ecormany
Copy link
Contributor

Overview

The app is too liberal in using the term "Empty" for pipette mounts. We should adopt clearer language on the Devices and Protocols page.

Current Behavior

Robots page

On the robots page, both mounts for unavailable robots are listed as "Empty". Since the robots aren't in communication with the app, that information may be incorrect (and likely is incorrect in settings where users don't remove their pipettes).
empty mount - disconnected

Protocols page

If a protocol only uses a single pipette, it lists the other mount as "empty". This makes it seem like the protocol requires that the other pipette be removed in order to run it, when this is not the case.
empty mount - not used

Expected Behavior

Robots page

The mount sections should either show:

  1. The pipettes that were in place when the robot was last seen.
  2. Some text expressing that the information is not available: e.g. "Unknown" or an em dash

Protocol page

The unused mount should say "Unused" or "Not used".

Steps To Reproduce

View any unavailable robot on the Robots page or any loaded protocol on the Protocols page.

Operating system

Mac

Robot setup or anything else?

No response

@ecormany ecormany added the 6.0-feedback Feedback for the 6.0 release label Apr 26, 2022
@koji
Copy link
Contributor

koji commented Apr 28, 2022

@emilywools @mmencarelli
What do you think about this?

Another question empty 's first letter should be a capital letter?

@nusrat813
Copy link

Addressing Ed's expected behavior comment #1 - #10032

@ecormany
Copy link
Contributor Author

Another question empty 's first letter should be a capital letter?

I think initial capital on any of the language we wind up using, so: Empty, Unused, Not used, Unknown, etc.

@nusrat813
Copy link

@mikecardarelli - to ticket
protocol page - unused
wording for empty not needed because section will be taken out

@mikecardarelli
Copy link

@bndo bndo changed the title 5.1 Feedback: mounts described as "empty" when they aren't or don't need to be 6.0 Feedback: mounts described as "empty" when they aren't or don't need to be May 19, 2022
@y3rsh
Copy link
Collaborator

y3rsh commented Jun 8, 2022

I think this is good
image
image

@y3rsh y3rsh added the complete Completely resolved and/or verified fixed. label Jun 8, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
6.0-feedback Feedback for the 6.0 release complete Completely resolved and/or verified fixed.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants